It was reported on (b)(6) 2021, a 25mm aortic sjm masters series mechanical heart valve was implanted in the mitral position.The physician had intended to implant a 25mm mitral sjm masters series mechanical heart valve.When the valve was implanted in the mitral position and the patient was taken off bypass, it was noted that the patient's heart was not beating properly.After further diagnosis and confirmation, it was determined that the implanted valve was a 25mm aortic sjm masters series mechanical heart valve.The incorrect aortic sjm masters series mechanical heart valve was explanted and replaced with a new 25mm sjm masters series mechanical heart valve.There was a clinically significant delay in procedure due to the incorrect valve being implanted.The patient is reported to be in stable condition and is being monitored.Additional information is pending.
|
Additional information: d9, h3, h6.The reported event of an aortic valve being found in a mitral valve box and implant of that valve in the mitral position was reported.Information from the field indicated that the tray inside the mitral valve box was labeled with an aortic valve label and that the qa seal of the box was "damaged" prior to implanting the valve.The investigation found that the returned valve, which had blood on it consistent with implant of the device, was an aortic valve; the sewing cuff contained three suture marks as opposed to the four on a mitral valve.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and the product met all specifications, including the qa seal being intact prior to shipment.Information from the field indicated that the device with sn (b)(6) (aortic) was found inside the box for device sn (b)(6) (mitral) and that the reverse was also true.Both shelf boxes had damaged qa seals when examined prior to use, with imaging being received from the field which appeared to show the qa seal of the aortic valve box was cut open when it was found in storage.Information from the hospital determined that they examine the packaging for damage prior to accepting the devices for storage.In addition, the devices were manufactured 9 months apart and were shipped in separate shipments to the hospital, one month apart.Neither device was reworked after their initial manufacture and placement of the qa seal on the box.Both devices were stored in the same "safe" at the hospital.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident appears to be consistent with the devices being opened in the field and being accidentally replaced in the incorrect box.Please note, per the instructions for use, (b)(4) rev.A, "warnings do not use if the tamper-evident container seal or inner/outer tray seals are damaged, broken or missing." and "three suture markers on aortic sewing cuff.".
|