It was reported that during the procedure for trans-cell technique, physician placed the subject stent successfully around the left side of ic-pc.While guiding a microcatheter through the subject stent, the proximal marker of the subject stent broke and moved near the distal side of the neck.When the microcatheter was delivered, it was also difficult to guide it into the coil mass as the subject stent was deformed.The subject stent was retrieved using a snare device.The broken fragment of the marker was left inside the patient's anatomy.The procedure was completed and no future treatment is scheduled to remove the broken fragment as there was no effect on blood flow in the patient.Patient's anatomy was average.No other clinical consequences were reported to the patient due to this event.
|
It was reported that during the procedure for trans-cell technique, physician placed the subject stent successfully around the left side of ic-pc.While guiding a microcatheter through the subject stent, the proximal marker of the subject stent broke and moved near the distal side of the neck.When the microcatheter was delivered, it was also difficult to guide it into the coil mass as the subject stent was deformed.The subject stent was retrieved using a snare device.The broken fragment of the marker was left inside the patient's anatomy.The procedure was completed and no future treatment is scheduled to remove the broken fragment as there was no effect on blood flow in the patient.Patient's anatomy was average.No other clinical consequences were reported to the patient due to this event.
|
Due to the automated mes system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During the visual inspection, the stent was seen to be broken and deformed.There was no sdw and introducer sheath returned.Functional testing was not carried out due to damage of stent.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.Additional information provided by the customer indicated the device prepared for use as per the directions for use, there was no damage noted to the packaging prior to opening the packaging, the device was confirmed to be in good condition during preparation/prior to use on the patient and the patients anatomy was average.The broken marker of the stent was attempted to be removed with a goose neck snare, the marker remained but there was no effect on the blood flow, so the procedure was completed.The stent was returned deformed and was found to be fractured, based on this the as reported can be confirmed.The as reported ro marker(s) detached/separated/not visible under fluoroscopy, stent deformed, sdw friction and un -retrieved device fragments as well as the as analyzed stent deformed and stent broken/fractured during use will be assigned procedural factors as this complaint appears to be associated with a product that met stryker and design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.
|