Model Number M006180223090 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/26/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The event was reported by the distributor.The physician is: (b)(6).(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a contour ureteral stent was used during a stent replacement procedure in the ureter, performed on (b)(6) 2021.During unpacking, it was noticed that the stent seemed to be separated.Another contour ureteral stent was opened and successfully completed the procedure.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.Boston scientific has been unable to obtain additional information regarding the event to date, despite good faith efforts.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a contour ureteral stent was used during a stent replacement procedure in the ureter, performed on (b)(6) 2021.During unpacking, it was noticed that the stent seemed to be separated.Another contour ureteral stent was opened and successfully completed the procedure.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.Boston scientific has been unable to obtain additional information regarding the event to date, despite good faith efforts.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The event was reported by the distributor.The physician is: dr.(b)(6).Block h6: medical device problem code a0401 captures the reportable event of stent shaft break.Block h10: the returned contour ureteral stent was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the stent was found with the bladder pigtail detached (the detached section was missing).The suture string and the positioner did not returned for the analysis.No other issues with the device were noted.The reported event was not confirmed.According to product analysis, it was found with the bladder pigtail detached, this problem could have been generated due to the technique of the physician with an excess of force and the anatomy of the patient could contributed with the cause of the failure; also, it is important to mention that the detached section and the suture string did not returned that is aligned with the interaction of the device with the suture string, when it is pull out with an excess of force damaging the performance of the catheter.Since the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.Therefore, adverse event related to procedure is selected as the most probable root cause for the complaint.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|