• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION STENTS ADVANTA V12; STENT, RENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION STENTS ADVANTA V12; STENT, RENAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 85331
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 09/02/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Follow-up report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
During a fevar procedure, after deflation of the advanta v12 stent in the renal artery the customer realizes an occlusion of the artery.After retrieval of the sheath they realized that there is no balloon material on it, so they found that the balloon fell off from the catheter and was still in the patient.Kidney was 2 hours without perfusion during several attempts to place an additional stent.Prolonged procedure occurred.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An evaluation of the returned device was conducted.The details of the complaint stated that during a fevar procedure, after deflation of the advanta v12 in the renal artery the balloon was missing and in the renal artery.The 7fr terumo introducer sheath was also returned.The sheath at the distal tip was badly deformed and appears as if the deformation noted is all on one side as if the catheter upon withdrawal was at an extreme angle.Upon review of the returned stent delivery system the balloon was no longer on the catheter shaft and had separated from the proximal and distal welds of the catheter cleanly.Both the radiopaque ro marker bands were still in place and not loose.The catheter shaft did not have any signs of damage including stretching of the catheter shaft.The balloon welds were inspected.Both the proximal and distal welds were approximately 3.5mm long and is indicative of a properly welded balloon.The balloon necks when trimmed after balloon forming are cut to 4mm in length.The thermal welding tooling jaws weld area is also 3.5mm.There is no reason to suspect based on the dimensions observed with the weld area that the proximal and distal welds were not conforming.The device history records show that this product lot of catheters passed all quality and performance criteria without and non- conformances.During the manufacture of the device the balloon welds are tested by tensile testing both the proximal and distal balloon welds.The test data for the proximal balloon weld shows that the minimum bond strength recorded was 20.2n.The product specification document states that the minimum allowable tensile strength is 15 n.This requirement was met.The distal balloon weld data shows that the minimum tensile strength noted was 10.6n which met specifications.Based on the details of the complaint it has been confirmed that the balloon had been separated from the catheter shaft however it cannot be confirmed that the device had left the site of manufacturing with a defect that may have contributed to the separation of the balloon from the catheter shaft.The instructions for use (ifu) state in the warnings and cautions section the following: do not force passage or withdrawal of the guidewire or delivery system if resistance is encountered.Deflate the balloon by pulling vacuum on the inflation device to its maximum volume for 40 seconds.Verify full balloon deflation via fluoroscopy before proceeding.The details provided indicate that the procedure was a fevar procedure to fix an endograft in the region of the renal artery due to an aortic aneurism.Based on the details of the complaint it appears as if the balloon may have been separated while trying to withdraw the balloon back into the introducer sheath as the sheath deformation suggests based on the deformation noted.The probable root cause is most likely that too much force was applied to the catheter resulting in the balloon separation.Based on the details of the complaint it appears as if the balloon may have been separated while trying to withdraw the balloon back into the introducer sheath as the sheath deformation suggests based on the deformation noted.The probable root cause is most likely that too much force was applied to the catheter resulting in the balloon separation.
 
Event Description
N/a.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information.
 
Event Description
N/a.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STENTS ADVANTA V12
Type of Device
STENT, RENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION
40 continental blvd
merrimack NH
Manufacturer (Section G)
ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION
40 continental blvd
merrimack NH
Manufacturer Contact
lori gosselin
40 continental blvd
merrimack, NH 
MDR Report Key12530890
MDR Text Key273303953
Report Number3011175548-2021-01001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAU
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/25/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/07/2024
Device Model Number85331
Device Catalogue Number85331
Device Lot Number467688
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/15/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/08/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNKNOWN.
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-