Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.Visual inspection performed showed a main coil, introducer sheath and delivery wire were returned for this complaint.The coil and delivery wire were not interlocked within introducer sheath.All parts returned separated.Coil was noted severely kinked and stretched.The delivery wire was inspected, and no damages were found.The introducer sheath was inspected, and no damages were found.No more damages were found.Microscopic inspection on delivery wire revealed that the proximal end has a smooth surface.The interlocking arm was inspected, and no damages were noticed.Microscopic inspection on main coil revealed that the zap tip has a smooth surface.The interlocking arm was inspected, and no damages were noticed.Dimensional inspection on delivery wire revealed that the weld od (max) outer diameter, wire arm od, wire zap tip (max) were within specification.Dimensional inspection on main coil revealed that the number of distal fiber bundles, zap tip od and primary coil od were within specification.However, a number of proximal fiber bundles were missing.
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 28sep2021.It was reported that the device could not be delivered and prematurely deployed.The target lesion was located in the internal iliac artery.A 10mm x 40cm interlock -35 coil was selected for use.During the procedure, the coil could not be delivered.However, when the device was about to be withdrawn from the patient's body, it was released spontaneously in the protective sheath.The device was simply pulled out from the patient's body.The procedure was completed with another of same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient was stable post procedure.However, device analysis revealed that the fiber bundles were incomplete and device was separated.
|