• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD MID-C 115; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM,

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD MID-C 115; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM, Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 115
Device Problem Biocompatibility (2886)
Patient Problem Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 09/20/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
First investigation: production process analysis: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to specification.User (surgeon and patient) information analysis: the patient kyphosis angle pre-op was high within the approved indications and hence the company advised "the kyphosis at t12 may be problematic.Pay extra attention to clean under the implant in this location.Leave the t9 screw higher than the t10 screw.Don't drive the l3 screw too low but leave it 3-4 mm above the bone.Make sure the male pole of the mid-c rod is positioned cephalad.Following the patient 6 month follow-up the surgeon noted the kyphosis was worsening but no patient complaints.X-ray evaluation implies that the failure was caused due to the progression of the kyphosis generating a force below the implant.Design : the design of the mid-c system is aiming to take mainly axial forces, resulting from the load generated by the distraction of the curve and the relevant body weight.The device was tested in an axial direction ((b)(4)) and was found to be able to hold 700n load for 10 million cycles of axial load.As part of apifix commitment to continuous improvement, (b)(4) was initiated to further investigate to prevent and minimize the rate of implant breakage.The company investigation indicated that implant breakage can result from trauma, practicing severe sports, development of hyper-kyphosis, inserting the pedicle screws in a wrong trajectory, not working according to the surgical technique, and most commonly from the implant reaching its end of the way.Breakages were evident in 3 main regions, the implant base, the main rod, and the rod's connection to the poly-axial joint.The most common point of failure was the implant rod in implants reaching their maximal elongation.Corrective action: the company already implemented corrective action of extender left (eco-8696 and supplement s003), in some thoracolumbar cases the surgeon may consider to use the pre-bent extender (extender left) to guarantee full range of motion for the poly-axial joint.Risk assessment: the current device breakage rate due to any reason is (b)(4) and is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's clinical evaluation report (0.2%-15.5%) ((b)(4)).The risk of the broken rod has been assessed and found to be acceptable ((b)(4) hazard id (b)(4)).
 
Event Description
The surgeon reported that the mid-c rod broke.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 115
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM,
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
adi prager
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key12672184
MDR Text Key278133403
Report Number3013461531-2021-00033
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
UDI-Device Identifier07290018128039
UDI-Public07290018128039
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,study,use
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/21/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/21/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date05/01/2024
Device Model NumberMID-C 115
Device Catalogue NumberMUS-115-040
Device Lot NumberAF 05-01-19
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/10/2021
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-