Note: this report pertains to a spyscope ds ii catheter and a spyglass ds controller used during the same procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a spyscope ds ii catheter and a spyglass ds controller were used during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed in the common bile duct on (b)(6) 2021.During preparation, the staff noticed that the illustrated picture of spy ds was in the monitor and when they plugged in the spyscope ds ii catheter nothing happened, still the illustrated picture was in the monitor.The procedure was not completed due to this event.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be ok.
|
Note: this report pertains to a spyscope ds ii catheter and a spyglass ds controller used during the same procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a spyscope ds ii catheter and a spyglass ds controller were used during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed in the common bile duct on (b)(6) 2021.During preparation, the staff noticed that the illustrated picture of spy ds was in the monitor and when they plugged in the spyscope ds ii catheter nothing happened, still the illustrated picture was in the monitor.The procedure was not completed due to this event.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be ok.
|
Block h6 (impact codes): impact code f1001 is being used to capture the reportable event of aborted/cancelled procedure.Block h10: the returned spyglass ds digital controller was analyzed by enercon technologies, and a visual evaluation noted that the top cover and and front panel were cosmetically damaged.Both rear y/c video outputs were worn.A functional evaluation noted that the catheter interface contacts requires cleaning and light engine calibration.The light was disassembled.The catheter interface contacts and connector socket assembly were cleaned.The 32 conductor flex cable, top cover, cover gasket, front panel, keypad, and y/c video outputs were replaced.Light engine calibration was performed and a test was ran.An electrical safety test was performed and the unit passed all tests.The reported event was confirmed.Upon analysis, the problem is unlikely related to manufacturing, as product analysis identified issues related to use and maintenance and did not identify any manufacturing defect.In addition, during a device history record review conducted by enercon, it was confirmed that the device met all manufacturing specifications.Based on all gathered information, the most probable root cause of this event is cause traced to maintenance.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.A search of the complaint database confirmed that no similar complaint exist for the specified lot.Block h11: correction - block h6 (impact code and device code) has been corrected, initial reporter tab e corrected.
|