• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC. MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM; GROWING ROD SYSTEM - MAGNETIC ACTUATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC. MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM; GROWING ROD SYSTEM - MAGNETIC ACTUATION Back to Search Results
Model Number MS1-4570R
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bacterial Infection (1735); Purulent Discharge (1812); Inflammation (1932); Necrosis (1971); Skin Discoloration (2074); Burning Sensation (2146); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Localized Skin Lesion (4542)
Event Date 08/18/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been returned for evaluation as it remains in-situ.The root cause is unable to be determined at this time.If any additional information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
Information was received that the patient developed a "skin eruption" and metal reaction.A cleansing and debridement procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2021.The reaction seems to be due to an oily substance found round the top portion of the actuator of the rod.Additionally, it was reported that there was discoloration of the surrounding tissue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: additional information received from the surgeon: both cultures were taken from deep tissue, around magnet area, on the two separate times patient went to or, first for the cleansing, later for removal.The devitalized tissue created a sinus tract into the skin, which ulcerated and thus making the contamination (enterococcus faecalis) possible.Enterococcus faecalis likely from cross contamination when skin erupted (organism not typical from surgical site infection 3 years ago).Device evaluation: upon return score marks were observed on the distraction rod.The laser mark on the rod was confirmed.X-ray images of the internal components showed no obvious damage and revealed the rod was partially distracted.The rod was functionally tested and was able to distract and retract with the erc and manual distractor per specifications.Distraction force testing also met specification.During the functional testing no fluid/oily substance was extruded out of the actuator.The reported issue was unable to be confirmed as no problem was found with the device.The cause of the reported "skin eruption", metal reaction, and tissue discoloration cannot be determined and no direct correlation to device materials of construction can be made.Based on the available pre-clinical and clinical information and the fact that the main external components of the magec rods are manufactured from a titanium alloy, which has successfully been used for decades in implantable medical devices, the biocompatibility-related risks are considered to be low in general.Device records review: review of the device history records revealed no discrepancies related to this complaint.The rod was manufactured in accordance with the specified requirements and met all of the required quality inspection criteria prior to release.
 
Event Description
N/a.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received via medwatch that in 2020, the patient complained of a burning-like sensation in their back.The patient's parents later observed a big bump in the center of their back.They were concerned of chemical exposure.The surgeon suspected it to be a bursitis due to friction of the rod with the tissue and prescribed an anti-inflammatory.The bump decreased except for one circular bump in the center.It changed in color from normal skin to very dark red and was suppurating.The wound was drained and the surgeon prescribed cephalexin for 2 weeks.In 2021, the patient's parents sent a photo of the wound to the surgeon as it turned black and continued suppurating.The patient was treated with silver nitrate twice a week as well as oral antibiotics (clindamycin, cefdinir, and amoxicillin).The patient underwent a revision to clean the wound in which they were noted to have necrotic tissue that went from the outer skin all the way down to the rod.During the explant procedure, bone tissue was surrounding the rod which required bone to be cut and removed in order to extract the rod.The patient was treated with iv ampicillin, gentamicin sulfate and meropenem for 6 weeks.
 
Event Description
See h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
GROWING ROD SYSTEM - MAGNETIC ACTUATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
101 enterprise dr, suite 100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer (Section G)
NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
101 enterprise dr, suite 100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
101 enterprise dr, suite 100
aliso viejo, CA 92656
MDR Report Key12691958
MDR Text Key278835290
Report Number3006179046-2021-00489
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PGN
UDI-Device Identifier00812258026349
UDI-Public812258026349
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K171791
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/25/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMS1-4570R
Device Lot NumberA170606-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/10/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/25/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age9 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-