• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number FEM14040
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Invagination (1336); Material Perforation (2205); Misfire (2532)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 10/05/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 05/2024).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a stent graft placement procedure in right arm fistula.The stent graft did not properly unsheathe from the catheter, and after the device was removed from the patient, the radiopaque markers were allegedly partially deployed.The procedure was completed using another device.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a review of manufacturing records was not performed, as additional complaints have not been reported for this lot.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the sample was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Based on the investigation performed in the laboratory, the stent was found partially deployed, and a stent strut was found perforating the outer sheath.The perforation of the sheath by one of the struts of the stent is assessed as being the main issue, which led to partial deployment and break of the marker band.In this case, the system was flushed, and appropriate guidewire was used.The procedure was performed bareback.Additionally, the stent graft was placed straight upon deployment.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for 'material perforation' as the main issue and 'break', 'material invagination' and 'misfire' as the cascading events.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling, it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risks.Regarding the preparation of the device the instructions for use states 'flush the stent graft lumen with sterile saline by using a small volume syringe.A) attach the syringe to the luer port at the back of the endovascular system (.).B) attach the syringe to the luer port on the y-adapter, (.) close the stopcock when flushing is complete and remove the syringe from the luer port'.Regarding the precautions prior and during deployment the instructions for use states 'prior to stent graft deployment, ensure that the proximal (inflow) stent graft end is positioned in a straight section of the lumen to reduce the risk of higher deployment forces and possible endovascular system failure' and 'if unusual resistance or high deployment force is encountered during stent graft deployment, abort the procedure, remove the delivery system and use an alternative device.' the instructions for use states regarding the accessories 'the use of an appropriately sized introducer sheath is recommended; prepare a stiff 0.035" guidewire per its instructions for use and advance the guidewire under fluoroscopy to the target location' the packaging pictograms indicate an introducer size of 10f and a 0.035" guidewire.H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2024), g3, h6 (device).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a stent graft placement procedure in right arm fistula.The stent graft did not properly unsheathe from the catheter, and after the device was removed from the patient, the radiopaque markers were allegedly partially deployed.The procedure was completed using another device.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Type of Device
ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstr. 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
judy ludwig
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key12725978
MDR Text Key279256792
Report Number2020394-2021-01923
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFV
UDI-Device Identifier04049519008684
UDI-Public(01)04049519008684
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130029
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/01/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberFEM14040
Device Catalogue NumberFEM14040
Device Lot NumberANFS4672
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/27/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/20/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight110 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-