A lead extraction procedure commenced to remove a right atrial (ra) and a right ventricular (rv) lead due to needing an mri.Spectranetics lead locking devices (llds) were inserted into each lead to provide traction.Using a spectranetics 14f glidelight laser sheath and a spectranetics large visisheath dilator sheath to attempt extraction of the ra lead, the physician noted that the tip of the ra lead was adhered to the rv lead, and the visisheath was used to break apart the binding on the two leads.The ra lead then came free, and a pericardial effusion was noted on transesophageal echocardiography (tee) with a slight blood pressure drop, blood pressure controlled by anesthesia.Rescue efforts began, and the decision was made to drain the effusion via pericardiocentesis.A suspected superior vena cava (svc)/ra junction or ra perforation was suspected (injury location was not confirmed because a sternotomy was not performed).Once the pericardium was drained, the patient remained stable and the injury was assumed to have clotted off.Further information from the rep indicated that the physician felt the injury was as a result of traction, since the glidelight device never reached the suspected injury site, and there were no hemodynamic changes noted during and after use of the visisheath device.Both the ra and rv leads were extracted per report.This report captures the lld present within the ra lead when the suspected svc/ra or ra perforation occurred.There was no alleged malfunction of any spectranetics devices in use during the procedure.
|