• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, BD MAX¿ INSTRUMENT; INSTRUMENTATION FOR CLINICAL MULTIPLEX TEST SYSTEMS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, BD MAX¿ INSTRUMENT; INSTRUMENTATION FOR CLINICAL MULTIPLEX TEST SYSTEMS Back to Search Results
Model Number 441916
Device Problem Fire (1245)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/08/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that while using the bd instrument max clinical an explosion was observed by the laboratory personnel.There was no impact.Assays used: unspecified.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "it felt like a small explosion, everything went off, and now there is a smell of burning.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated, but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.Medical device expiration date: na.There were multiple 510k numbers reported to be involved.The information for the additional 510k is as follows: pma / 510(k)#: k130470.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: investigation summary a power failure/ups complaint was reported against the bd max instrument catalog number 441916, serial number (b)(4).The customer reported hearing an explosive sound coming from the vicinity of the instrument.They noted that all power was lost and that they noticed a burning smell.Field service was dispatched.Field service disassembled the instrument to determine if the instrument was burnt.No portion of the bd instrument was burnt, but the smell was determined to be coming from the ups.The ups was replaced and instrument was returned to the customer functional.No parts are being returned to bd for investigation.The complaint is unconfirmed.The root cause is due to the ups functioning as its intended design by tripping the breaker due to a facility electrical surge.Investigation consisted of a review of the instrument installation, service history, and related complaint data.Bd will continually monitor for trends related to this complaint.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using the bd instrument max clinical an explosion was observed by the laboratory personnel.There was no impact.Assays used: unspecified the following information was provided by the initial reporter: " it felt like a small explosion, everything went off, and now there is a smell of burning".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, BD MAX¿ INSTRUMENT
Type of Device
INSTRUMENTATION FOR CLINICAL MULTIPLEX TEST SYSTEMS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
katie swenson
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key12760818
MDR Text Key280439845
Report Number1119779-2021-01771
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OOI
UDI-Device Identifier00382904419165
UDI-Public00382904419165
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K111860
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/24/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/07/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number441916
Device Catalogue Number441916
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/24/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/23/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-