• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR CORK NEUROFORM ATLAS 3.0MM X 21MM NO TIP - CE; STENT, INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR CORK NEUROFORM ATLAS 3.0MM X 21MM NO TIP - CE; STENT, INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number M003EZAS30210
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Aneurysm (1708); Stenosis (2263); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 10/11/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device remains implanted in patient.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had an aneurysm recanalization approximately 2 years after the first procedure.The physician planned to coil the aneurysm through an already existing stent.During the second retreatment procedure, the physician noticed the right posterior communicating artery was not perfusing well anymore.It was decided to add the subject stent to improve perfusion and medication was given to resolve possible blood clots.Physician then noticed the subject stent had a stenosis.In the physicians opinion, it did not look like a stent stenosis due to thrombosis.It appeared more like the coil mass inside the aneurysm compressed the stent back into the vessel and squeezed it.Patient had good working collateral vessels and there were no clinical consequences to the patient due to this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H4 manufacturing date ¿ added, d4 expiration date - added.The subject device is not available; therefore, visual and functional testing as well as physical analysis cannot be performed.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.Due to the automated mes system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.Based upon medical review, the harm observed in the complaint is anticipated in nature as per the device risk assessment and does not require escalation to senior management.It was reported that during intervention he noticed a stenosis of the stent.According to the physician, it did not look like in stent stenosis due to thrombosis.It looked more like the coil compressed the stent back into the vessel and squeezed it in both cases.The device was not returned as it had been implanted.The risk of the reported events are anticipated in nature as per the device risk documentation, however in this case it is possible that the event may be related to the coil mass encroaching into the parent vessel.An probable assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the reported complaint, as the issue is associated with a product that meets stryker design and manufacture specifications and was used in according with the dfu but due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use, the product performance was limited.H3 other text : device remains implanted in patient.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had an aneurysm recanalization approximately 2 years after the first procedure.The physician planned to coil the aneurysm through an already existing stent.During the second retreatment procedure, the physician noticed the right posterior communicating artery was not perfusing well anymore.It was decided to add the subject stent to improve perfusion and medication was given to resolve possible blood clots.Physician then noticed the subject stent had a stenosis.In the physicians opinion, it did not look like a stent stenosis due to thrombosis.It appeared more like the coil mass inside the aneurysm compressed the stent back into the vessel and squeezed it.Patient had good working collateral vessels and there were no clinical consequences to the patient due to this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NEUROFORM ATLAS 3.0MM X 21MM NO TIP - CE
Type of Device
STENT, INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR CORK
ida industrial estate
model farm road
cork NA
EI  NA
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR CORK
ida industrial estate
model farm road
cork NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
tara lopez
47900 bayside parkway
fremont, CA 94538
5104132500
MDR Report Key12783440
MDR Text Key284841020
Report Number3008881809-2021-00473
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P180031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/09/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberM003EZAS30210
Device Lot Number23053003
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/19/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
TARGET COILS (STRYKER)
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
Patient SexFemale
-
-