• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH HIPSTAR V40 STEM N Ø5; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROU

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH HIPSTAR V40 STEM N Ø5; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROU Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 7850-1-005
Device Problems Corroded (1131); Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Osteolysis (2377); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 12/03/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with an lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his right hip on or about (b)(6) 2007 and was revised on (b)(6) 2020.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the devices at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event an event regarding disassociation, loosening, osteolysis and abnormal ion level involving a hipstar stem was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: this inquiry reports the failure of a right total hip arthroplasty approximately 13 years after implantation due to femoral loosening, osteolysis, and head disassociation.I can confirm this event took place since i was able to read the revision operation report.Regarding the possible root cause of this event, i cannot determine it with certainty.Causes of femoral loosening or multifactorial including surgical technique factors, patient activity factors and patient¿s height and weight.Causes of osteolysis are multifactorial including poly wear and other types of particle synovitis.Causes of head disassociation are multifactorial including trunnion failure, and corrosion.In this case i cannot confirm corrosion since there is no metallurgical analysis.-product history review: could not be performed as lot number was invalid.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the reported unknown stem was mated with a lfit v40 cocr head.The cocr head has been identified to be within scope of an nc and capa.No further investigation for this event is required at this time.If additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with an lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his right hip on or about (b)(6) 2007 and was revised on (b)(6) 2020.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the devices at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.Update on 03-mar-2022 per clinician review: an operative note by dr.Dated (b)(6) 2020 is provided.The preoperative diagnosis was ¿mechanical loosening of prosthetic hip¿ and the postop diagnosis was the same.The operation performed was a revision right total hip arthroplasty.The surgeon used a cementless 70 mm shell, a polyethylene with a 28 mm inner diameter, a wagner sl femoral stem was utilized, demineralized bone putty, and a 28 mm femoral head was utilized.Femoral component was grossly loose.There was no evidence of infection.The surgeon describes a huge amount of osteolysis with "amorphous sludge type of whitish gray material".He states that the femoral head was disassociated from the femoral stem and there was a large amount of corrosive black typical material on both the male trunnion as well as the female portion of the femoral head." per operative report: the explant osteotome was used to remove the well-fixed acetabular component.There were no significant defects behind the acetabular shell.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HIPSTAR V40 STEM N Ø5
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROU
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
61498200
MDR Report Key12860273
MDR Text Key281137513
Report Number0002249697-2021-01949
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K051223
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/23/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number7850-1-005
Device Lot NumberINVALID
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-