A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number indicated that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.A review of the technical service onsite history showed no abnormalities that could have contributed to this event: laser was successfully verified prior and treatment date.The review of logfile for the day of treatment shows all laser system functions were within specifications.During start-up of the system the vacuum, the energy check and the ablation tests were performed without any issue.The energy was stable during the whole day.The log file shows multiple patient successfully performed treatments.The reported treatment could be identified in the logfile.The reported left eye was treated twice.The beam control check for the left eye (os) was done about one minute before laser fired instead of immediately before firing in both treatments.During the first treatment, the patient interface was docked twice on the left eye (os) because the surgeon interrupted the suction process after reaching valid suction values (suction1 and suction 2) by pressing the foot pedal; laser was not fired yet.The vacuum process was repeated and successfully completed.The first treatment was aborted during bed cut from surgeon by pressing the foot pedal, and logfiles show the following info message: 'vacuum pumps stopped by foot pedal - treatment was aborted.Hence, the first treatment was aborted by the surgeon and not by the device.The first treatment was cancelled and was repeated afterwards.For the second treatment, the surgeon set the energy setting of canal cut to 0.10 j.During second treatment surgeon stopped the treatment once during bed cut by pressing foot pedal, proceeded with the treatment and completed it successfully.No relevant deviation between planned and performed energy was detectable.The thickness of the flap was thinner than the recommended flap thickness.No technical root cause could be identified.No technical root cause could be determined for the reported event.With current information a device malfunction could be excluded.According to available information the suction break and the incomplete flap was caused by user technique (docking and general handling).The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|