(b)(4).Initial report.Report source, foreign - event occurred in (b)(6).Customer has indicated that the product is in process of being returned to zimmer biomet for investigation.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
(b)(4).This final report is being submitted to relay additional information.Complaint summary: photographs of the instrument have been provided which confirms the foot has fractured from the instrument.X-rays or medical notes have not been provided.The investigation has been limited to the information provided, a review of the device history records, and a complaint history search.Review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing that could be related to the reported event.Review of complaint history identified additional similar complaints (52) for the reported item number, and zero additional complaints for the same item/lot combination.This device is used for treatment.The issue relates to an instrument therefore an implants compatibility check is not required.These part and lot combinations are not associated with any recalls at the time the search was conducted.The likely condition of the device when it left zimmer biomet is conforming to specification.The root cause of the reported event cannot be determined with the information provided.The fracture could be ascribed to expected wear and tear over time, over impaction of the instrument, over/under-tightening of the instrument against tibial trays, sub-optimal use during surgery, or a combination of all these factors.The ifu provided with the compatible implants states: intra-operative fracture or breaking of instruments has been reported.Surgical instruments are subject to wear with normal usage.Instruments, which have experienced extensive use or excessive force, are susceptible to fracture.Surgical instruments should only be used for their intended purpose.Biomet recommends that all instruments be regularly inspected for wear and disfigurement, and prior to surgery.The surgical technique for cementless implantation advises that the device is to be impacted by the toffee mallet and that the device is to release the tibial tray before the tray is fully seated within the patient¿s bone.The reusable instrument lifespan manual instructs to look for fractures and surface damage during reprocessing.The investigation is completed based on current available information.If any additional information becomes available, then the complaint will be reopened and further investigated.H3 other text: item not returned.
|