• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP INC PRESTIGE RETR GRASPER SGL-ACT 5MM36CM; LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESSORIES, GYNECOLOGIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP INC PRESTIGE RETR GRASPER SGL-ACT 5MM36CM; LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESSORIES, GYNECOLOGIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 8361-00
Device Problem Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: the device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation of the unit was performed and no parts were returned for failure analysis.Therefore, the investigation was not able to confirm a device issue that could be associated with the reported event.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was not able to be conducted by the manufacturer as no lot # was provided by the complainant.However, all device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.Additionally, historical scrap rates were reviewed with no increase observed in scrap related to the complaint issue.Previous investigations performed against devices returned with distal braze failures identified improvement opportunities following a review of the tube sub assembly test procedure work instruction (wi), the brazing procedure wi, and the brazed joint buffing wi.While the tube subassembly joint is 100% percent tested with a torsional force, there was no requirement for applying a bending force to the joint.Therefore, a manual bend test was added to the wi.Additionally, a review of the torque test fixture and accompanying wi, noted the potential for the tube to slip inside the collet during inspections allowing for a defective part to potentially pass this test.The tube sub assembly test procedure was further updated to note this potential failure mode and to define the process for cleaning the parts and fixture/collet with alcohol prior to use.A review of the brazing procedure wi revealed that the glass tube was too short to effectively seal the brazing area off from the surrounding environment.Without a proper seal the brazing area could have insufficient argon present to facilitate effective brazing.The brazing procedure wi was updated to include a check for this condition prior to brazing.Additionally, the supplier updated the wi to optimize the order of operations of when flux is applied, the soldering ring is assembled, and the tube is loaded.This change ensured that flux would be present throughout the entire joint space and allow for proper solder travel.Furthermore, a functional review and visual examination of the nest, which the tube sub assembly sits into, was performed.This review revealed that the two argon access holes were clogged.Therefore, the associated preventative maintenance activities were updated to monitor the access holes and prevent a recurrence of buildup.Finally, the supplier updated the brazed joint buffing wi to note the potential failure mode of excessive buffing, which could remove too much material and weaken the joint.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.However, based on prior evaluations of complaint devices reported with a failure mode of distal braze break/separation, this event likely occurred due to inadequacies in the defined production process which limited the device performance.Aesculap inc.Opened a corrective action/preventive action (capa) for further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.
 
Event Description
It was reported to aesculap inc.That there was an issue with prestige retr grasper sgl-act 5mm36cm (part #8361-00).According to the complainant,during an unspecified procedure, the device had a functional failure.The instrument had issue with jaws.There was no patient harm nor surgical delay.The malfunction is filed under aic reference xc (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRESTIGE RETR GRASPER SGL-ACT 5MM36CM
Type of Device
LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESSORIES, GYNECOLOGIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP INC
3773 corporate parkway
center valley PA 18034
Manufacturer (Section G)
AESCULAP INC
3773 corporate parkway
center valley PA 18034
Manufacturer Contact
lindsay chromiak
3773 corporate parkway
center valley, PA 18034
MDR Report Key12909853
MDR Text Key282571587
Report Number2916714-2021-00222
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NWV
UDI-Device Identifier04046955083398
UDI-Public4046955083398
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/01/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/01/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number8361-00
Device Catalogue Number8361-00
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-