• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number CMS15-10C
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Positioning Failure (1158); Difficult to Remove (1528); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Positioning Problem (3009)
Patient Problem Transient Ischemic Attack (2109)
Event Date 11/10/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the device was stuck in the introducer sheath and transient ischemic attack (tia) occurred.A sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tavi) procedure.An introducer sheath was placed and the sentinel cps was advanced into position.The physician encountered difficulty in deploying one of the filters of the sentinel cps.While attempting to withdraw the sentinel cps, the sentinel became stuck in the introducer sheath causing buckling of the radial sheath.7cm of the sentinel cps remained outside the introducer sheath.The sentinel cps and introducer sheath were removed together from the patient.At an unspecified time, the patient experienced a transient ischemic attack (tia).The patient outcome is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the device was stuck in the introducer sheath and transient ischemic attack (tia) occurred.A sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tavi) procedure.An introducer sheath was placed and the sentinel cps was advanced into position.The physician encountered difficulty in deploying one of the filters of the sentinel cps.While attempting to withdraw the sentinel cps, the sentinel became stuck in the introducer sheath causing buckling of the radial sheath.7cm of the sentinel cps remained outside the introducer sheath.The sentinel cps and introducer sheath were removed together from the patient.At an unspecified time, the patient experienced a transient ischemic attack (tia).The patient outcome is unknown.It was further reported that the distal filter filter could not be deployed in the left common carotid artery due to tortuosity of the brachiocephalic artery and carotid angulation.The patient reportedly experienced the tia immediately post index procedure.A non-bsc valve was implanted.The patient was discharged home two days post index procedure.It was further reported that due to the anatomy of the patient, the distal curve could not be maneuvered into the left common carotid artery, thus the distal filter could not be placed in the left common carotid artery.There was no problem with the distal mechanism deployment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B5 describe event or problem - updated.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the device was stuck in the introducer sheath and transient ischemic attack (tia) occurred.A sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tavi) procedure.An introducer sheath was placed and the sentinel cps was advanced into position.The physician encountered difficulty in deploying one of the filters of the sentinel cps.While attempting to withdraw the sentinel cps, the sentinel became stuck in the introducer sheath causing buckling of the radial sheath.7cm of the sentinel cps remained outside the introducer sheath.The sentinel cps and introducer sheath were removed together from the patient.At an unspecified time, the patient experienced a transient ischemic attack (tia).The patient outcome is unknown.It was further reported that the distal filter filter could not be deployed in the left common carotid artery due to tortuosity of the brachiocephalic artery and carotid angulation.The patient reportedly experienced the tia immediately post index procedure.A non-bsc valve was implanted.The patient was discharged home two days post index procedure.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the device was stuck in the introducer sheath and transient ischemic attack (tia) occurred.A sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tavi) procedure.An introducer sheath was placed and the sentinel cps was advanced into position.The physician encountered difficulty in deploying one of the filters of the sentinel cps.While attempting to withdraw the sentinel cps, the sentinel became stuck in the introducer sheath causing buckling of the radial sheath.7cm of the sentinel cps remained outside the introducer sheath.The sentinel cps and introducer sheath were removed together from the patient.At an unspecified time, the patient experienced a transient ischemic attack (tia).The patient outcome is unknown.It was further reported that the distal filter filter could not be deployed in the left common carotid artery due to tortuosity of the brachiocephalic artery and carotid angulation.The patient reportedly experienced the tia immediately post index procedure.A non-bsc valve was implanted.The patient was discharged home two days post index procedure.It was further reported that due to the anatomy of the patient, the distal curve could not be maneuvered into the left common carotid artery, thus the distal filter could not be placed in the left common carotid artery.There was no problem with the distal mechanism deployment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: the sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was returned with a non-boston scientific (bsc) introducer sheath.Visual inspection revealed the non-bsc introducer sheath covered the proximal filter and therefore the proximal filter state could not be visually analyzed.The articulating distal sheath (ads) was relaxed and crushed.The articulating knob (#2) was loose.Due to the loose articulating knob (#2), the ads could not be flexed.Microscopic inspection of the sentinel cps identified screw drag marks on the articulating knob (#2).The distal filter was returned in a sheathed state and the distal filter slider (#3) was kinked.The distal filter was unable to be unsheathed due to the kink in the hypotube of the distal filter slider (#3).Following a flushing test, the proximal filter was able to be successfully unsheathed.The sentinel cps and non-bsc introducer sheath could be separated without issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
3636 n. laughlin blvd, suite 1
santa rosa CA 95403
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key12965183
MDR Text Key282101690
Report Number2134265-2021-15610
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K192460
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/08/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/19/2023
Device Model NumberCMS15-10C
Device Catalogue NumberCMS15-10C
Device Lot Number0027001329
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/03/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/19/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-