Catalog Number XXX-GENTRIX |
Device Problem
Degraded (1153)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Complaint sample was not returned for evaluation and lot number information has not been provided; therefore, an evaluation of the device could not be performed, and manufacturing records could not be reviewed.The cause(s) of the difficulty reported by the customer could not be determined.If additional relevant information becomes available in the future, this complaint will be reopened, and the respective evaluation performed.Trends will be monitored for this and similar issues.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medwatch mw5104878: a patient reported he had an inguinal hernia repair with an unknown gentrix surgical matrix device initially performed on (b)(6) 2021.The surgeon reported that there was no sign of the gentrix surgical matrix device during explant on (b)(6) 2021.This suggests that the gentrix device would most likely have been a psm (3 layer) or a psmx (6 layer) and that the device was completely resorbed after 65 days or 81 days depending on the event date being on (b)(6) 2021 versus on (b)(6) 2021.The patient required surgical intervention and hospitalization.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Complaint sample was not returned for evaluation and lot number information has not been provided; therefore, an evaluation of the device could not be performed, and manufacturing records could not be reviewed.The cause(s) of the difficulty reported by the customer could not be determined.If additional relevant information becomes available in the future, this complaint will be reopened, and the respective evaluation performed.Trends will be monitored for this and similar issues.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medwatch mw5104878: a patient reported he had an inguinal hernia repair with an unknown gentrix surgical matrix device initially performed on (b)(6) 2021.The surgeon reported that there was no sign of the gentrix surgical matrix device during explant on (b)(6) 2021.This suggests that the gentrix device would most likely have been a psm (3 layer) or a psmx (6 layer) and that the device was completely resorbed after 65 days or 81 days depending on the event date being on (b)(6) 2021 versus on (b)(6) 2021.The patient required surgical intervention and hospitalization.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|