• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE VANTAGE WITH SHIELD TECHNOLOGY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE VANTAGE WITH SHIELD TECHNOLOGY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number PED3-027-400-14
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Migration (4003)
Patient Problem Dysphasia (2195)
Event Date 12/08/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that a ped3-027-400-12 lot number: b224530 migrated after deployment.Distal part of the stent no longer covered the aneurysm neck.The cause was not enough distal anchoring.Stent appeared to be opposed before it happened.The second ped3-027-400-14 lot number: b219567 was telescoped inside the first stent covering the aneurysm.However after the stent was detached it was noticed that it also slipped back.But the aneurysm neck was still covered.The physican elected to secure the stent by deploying a neuroform atlas stent anchoring the stent position.The patient was being treated for an unruptured saccular aneurysm in the left opthamic artery.The max diameter was 6 mm and the neck diameter was 4 mm.The distal landing zone was 3.5 mm and the proximal landing zone was 3.9 mm.Vessel tortuosity was moderate. patient woke up from procedure with dysphasia.The first stent was deployed at the intended location.Full was apposition was achieved.No side branches covered by pipeline.The d istal part of the second stent was not well anchored despite appearance.The pipeline was not implanted at the intended location.The second pipeline missed the landing zone.No side branches covered by pipeline.Angiographic result post procedure contrast stasis in aneurysm.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that there was no friction or difficulty getting the device to the aneurysm neck.The device was in the correct position up until the point of no return/detachment.The pipeline was implanted using the push/pull deployment technique, where forward push was applied to the stent delivery system and at the same time the microcatheter was being withdrawn.The stent migrated due to the lack of distal anchoring.On fluoroscopy the stent appeared well apposed which is why the physician proceeded with detaching the stent, or they would have resheathed and repositioned the device.The first stent was not implanted in the intended located, and the second stent was in a suboptimal location thus requiring a neuroform atlas stent to stabilize the construct.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE VANTAGE WITH SHIELD TECHNOLOGY
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key12989826
MDR Text Key289194966
Report Number2029214-2021-01601
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/28/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/13/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPED3-027-400-14
Device Catalogue NumberPED3-027-400-14
Device Lot NumberB219567
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/14/2021
Date Device Manufactured06/11/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-