• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CVRX, INC. BAROSTIM NEO; CAROTID SINUS LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CVRX, INC. BAROSTIM NEO; CAROTID SINUS LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 2102
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Hematoma (1884); Unspecified Infection (1930); Thrombocytopenia (4431)
Event Date 11/03/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The results of the investigation are inconclusive at this time since the reported device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.Additional information has been requested from the facility.If the additional information is received from the site, a final report will be submitted when the information is received.The device history record and sterilization records for the reported ipg and csl have been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
An ipg replacement and relocation was performed on (b)(6) 2021.On (b)(6) 2021, a pet scan showed an infection along the lead and reaching 3-4 cm above the ipg.No other signs of infection was observed at other locations of the system.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient developed a hematoma near the new ipg.A small procedure was performed to drain the hematoma.The patient was discharged during the weekend of (b)(6) 2021 with a 14-day course of linexolide and ongoing doxycycline.It was noted that the patient had a "slow growing germ." a follow-up appointment was performed on (b)(6) 2021, and the antibiotics were continued, and a pet scan was planned for (b)(6) 2021.On the weekend of (b)(6) 2021, the patient experienced thrombocytopenia due to the antibiotics, the antiobiotherapy was adjusted, and the platelet count increased.It was expected the antibiotics could be stopped on (b)(6) 2021, and an explant would not be required.This event was a continuation of a previous event, where the ipg was located outside of the pocket.At that time it was recommended by cvrx to explant the lead due to the risk of infection; however, the doctors determined that it wasn't necessary.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This event was a continuation of (b)(4), where the ipg was located outside of the pocket.At that time it was recommended by cvrx to explant the lead due to the risk of infection; however, the doctors determined that it wasn't necessary.The devices remained implanted, so no device was returned for analysis.Based on the information received, it is likely that the movement of the lead contributed to the infection and the implant procedure contributed to the hematoma that formed at the new ipg site.The device history records for the ipg and csl serial numbers have been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.Cvrx id: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
An ipg replacement and relocation was performed on (b)(6) 2021, and the existing lead was tunneled to the new ipg location.At that time, it was recommended by cvrx to explant the lead due to the risk of infection; however, the doctors determined that it wasn't necessary.On (b)96) 2021, a pet scan showed a suspected infection along the lead and reaching 3-4 cm above the new ipg and infection along the tunneled lead track from the right to left side.No other signs of infection was observed at other locations of the system or in the neck.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient developed a hematoma near the new ipg.A small procedure was performed to drain the hematoma.The patient was discharged during the weekend of (b)(6) 2021 with a 14-day course of linexolide and ongoing doxycycline.It was noted that a "slow growing germ" was suspected.A follow-up appointment was performed on (b)(6) 2021, and the antibiotics were continued, and a pet scan was planned for (b)(6) 2021.On the weekend of (b)(6) 2021, the patient experienced thrombocytopenia due to the antibiotics, the antiobiotherapy was adjusted, and the platelet count increased.It was expected the antibiotics could be stopped on (b)(6) 2021, and an explant would not be required.As of (b)(6) 2022, nothing was observed on follow-up pet scans or ultrasounds, there were no signs of infection, and antibiotics had been discontinued.The patient will continue to be monitored to ensure the infection does not recur.It was noted that the patient's scars were healing well.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BAROSTIM NEO
Type of Device
CAROTID SINUS LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CVRX, INC.
9201 west broadway avenue
suite 650
minneapolis MN 55445
Manufacturer (Section G)
CVRX, INC.
9201 west broadway avenue
suite 650
minneapolis MN 55445
Manufacturer Contact
sarah hicks
9201 west broadway avenue
suite 650
minneapolis, MN 55445
MDR Report Key13011397
MDR Text Key288058628
Report Number3007972010-2021-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSR
UDI-Device Identifier00859144004005
UDI-Public(01)00859144004005(17)230504
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P180050
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/17/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/15/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/04/2023
Device Model Number2102
Device Catalogue Number100054-201
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/04/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight84 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-