As reported, approximately 5 years post op the initial rtsa, this (b)(6) female patient was revised due to the humerus and baseplate loosening.The cabled humerus from the initial surgery had failed to support the fractured humerus.The surgeon decided to use a depuy stem who had a larger head size to offer.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.Devices will not be retuning due to hospital policy.
|
Device evaluated by manufacturer: pending evaluation.Concomitant medical device(s): 320-01-38, (b)(4) - equinoxe reverse 38mm glenosphere.320-10-00, (b)(4) - equinoxe reverse tray adapter plate tray +0.320-15-01, (b)(4) - eq rev glenoid plate.320-15-05, (b)(4) - eq rev locking screw.320-20-00, (b)(4) - eq reverse torque defining screw kit.320-20-26, (b)(4) - eq rev compress screw lck cap kit, 4.5 x 26mm.320-20-30, (b)(4) - eq rev compress screw lck cap kit, 4.5 x 30mm.320-20-38, (b)(4) - eq rev compress screw lck cap kit, 4.5 x 38mm.320-20-38, (b)(4) - eq rev compress screw lck cap kit, 4.5 x 38mm.320-38-00, (b)(4) - equinoxe reverse 38mm humeral liner +0.
|
Section h10: (h3) the revision reported was likely the result of both patient conditions and an insufficient bond between the implants and the bones, which led to aseptic (non-infected) humeral and baseplate loosening.The failed cabled humerus likely contributed to the reported humeral loosening.However, this cannot be confirmed as the devices were not returned for evaluation and x-ray images were not provided.
|