• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number TJF-Q180V
Device Problems Device Reprocessing Problem (1091); Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) was informed that during the annual inspection at the service department of olympus (b)(4), it was found that forceps elevator had foreign material and inside of the light guide lens was dirty.The occurrence date of the event is unknown.There was no report of patient injury associated with the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device was inspected at (b)(4).(b)(4) checked the subject device and found the reported phenomena, also found that the foreign material on the forceps elevator was caused by insufficient cleaning and the insufficient reprocessed subject device might have been used to next patient.The exact cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined at this time.If additional information is received, this report will be supplemented.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information.Omsc reviewed the manufacturing history (dhr) of the subject device and confirmed no irregularity.Foreign material adhered to the forceps elevator it was confirmed that there was dirt on the light guide lens glue and the light guide lens, which might indicate the insufficient reprocessing.Therefore the causes were presumed as below: there was the possibility that the brushing method for the forceps elevator by the user differed from the brushing method for the forceps elevator recommended in the instruction manual.There was the possibility that the trainings for the facility staff that the device handling according to the instruction manual, the reprocessing when the device was returned after repair and/or the general reprocessing, were insufficient.Inside of the light guide lens was dirty it was considered that stress was applied to the distal end of the subject device because there was the dent on the c-cover.Therefore the causes were presumed as below: there was the possibility that physical stress made gap at the light guide lens glue, and dirt entered from the gap.There was the possibility that the components inside the light guide lens were corroded due to the moisture ingress into the subject device, consequently corrosion product was left as dirt.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13065578
MDR Text Key284694203
Report Number8010047-2021-16670
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDT
UDI-Device Identifier04953170367311
UDI-Public04953170367311
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K143153
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberTJF-Q180V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/26/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/26/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/22/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/23/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/16/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-