As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Expiry date: 09/2023.
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: three electronic photos were provided and reviewed.The first photo shows that the magnum needle in a package which is in primed position.The second photo shows product labeling which the product information was verified with tw.And the third photo shows the unpacked magnum needle which is different in size and also in primed position is kept next to a packed magnum needle.Based on the photo review the reported failures cannot be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as the package was not sealed.A definitive root cause for the alleged device markings / labelling problem and material twisted / bent could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 09/2023), g3, h6 (method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|