510k- k192908.Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.The instructions for use states, "inspect the device with particular attention to kinks, bends, or breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working conditions, do not use." prior to distribution, all fusion cytology brushes are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lots said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted and this represents an isolated occurrence.The likelihood of occurrence is considered remote.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
In preparation for a cytology procedure, the user selected a cook fusion cytology brush,.The brush would not retract into the catheter and from trying to retract, the brush broke off, subject of report.This occurred prior to patient contact; there was no impact to the patient.
|