As reported, while using a flexor parallel ureteral access sheath and dilators, they discovered fiber-like matter inside of the sheath lumen.The procedure was to extract kidney stones, and the user had inserted the device into the scope several times to perform the extraction.They removed it from the sheath lumen and replaced it with another device from the same lot.The fiber-like matter was also discovered in this device.They replaced it with a device from another manufacturer to successfully complete the procedure.They confirmed the fiber-like matter was not left inside of the patient's body.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Summary of event: as reported, while using a flexor parallel ureteral access sheath and dilators, they discovered fiber-like matter inside of the sheath lumen.The procedure was to extract kidney stones, and the user had inserted the device into the scope several times to to perform the extraction.They removed it from the sheath lumen and replaced it with another device from the same lot.The fiber-like matter was also discovered in this device.They replaced it with a device from another manufacturer to successfully complete the procedure.They confirmed the fiber-like matter was not left inside of the patient's body.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu) and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the returned complaint devices was also conducted.Two devices with outer packages were returned to cook for investigation.A tube containing the plastic shavings was also returned.One of the returned sheaths had delamination at the distal tip and a long shredded material is wrapped around the inside of the tip.The second sheath has tip delamination, but not as visible.The material inside the returned tube is most likely from the second sheath.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The instructions for use (ifu) provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: note: prior to placement, activate the hydrophilic coating by removing the dilator from the flexor sheath and immersing all components in sterile water or isotonic saline.This will allow the hydrophilic surface to absorb water and become lubricious, easing placement under standard conditions.Based on the available information, it is likely the sheaths were damaged during use by the instruments inserted through them during the procedure.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|