H10: additional information was received and the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be reportable as a malfunction.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one bard 7fr d/l catheter was returned for evaluation.Gross, microscopic visual and functional testing were performed.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported reflux within the device as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event cannot be verified and clinical conditions cannot be replicated to confirm these failures.The investigation is confirmed for the reported loss of or failure to bond issue as the distal end of the catheter body appeared to have silicone adhesive material and the inner catheter liners were noted exposed without any damage.Furthermore, the distal catheter segment was not returned for evaluation.Clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2022), g3, h6 (method).H11: b5, h1, h6 (patient, device, result, conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|