• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL PUERTO RICO, INC. SJM® MECHANICAL HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL PUERTO RICO, INC. SJM® MECHANICAL HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Backflow (1064)
Patient Problems Atrial Fibrillation (1729); Stroke/CVA (1770); Endocarditis (1834); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450); Renal Impairment (4499)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Related manufacturer reference number: 3014918977-2022-00005.The article, "early and midterm clinical outcomes of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic bioprosthetic valve degeneration: two faces of the same medal", was reviewed.This research article is a retrospective observational study to compare early and midterm outcomes of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation (viv-tavi) and redo surgical aortic valve replacement (re-savr) for aortic bioprosthetic valve degeneration.Edwards sapien, edward sapien 3, edward sapien xt, carpentier edwards, toronto freestyle stentless, hancock 2, mitroflow, st jude portico, trifecta valve, medtronic ultra porcine (mosaic) corevalve evolute, carbomedics mechanical, magna ease, perceval, and st jude mechanical were associated with this study.The article concluded that viv-tavi is a safe, feasible, and reliable procedure.This is supported from the primary and secondary endpoint outcomes obtained from the two cohorts.The primary and correspondence author is aleksander dokollari, md, department of cardiac surgery, (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported in a research article, 88 patient were included in the analysis from january 2010 to july 2018; 31 patients underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation and 57 patients underwent redo surgical aortic valve replacement.Edwards sapien, edward sapien 3, edward sapien xt, carpentier edwards, toronto freestyle stentless, hancock 2, mitroflow, st jude portico, trifecta valve, medtronic ultra porcine (mosaic) corevalve evolute, carbomedics mechanical, magna ease, perceval, and st jude mechanical were associated with this study.Events of postoperative regurgitation, "leak", "readmission to icu", re-intubation, atrial fibrillation, acute kidney insufficiency, "stroke or tia", pacemaker implant, infection, reoperation for bleeding, red blood cell transfusion, platelet transfusion, plasma transfusion, endocarditis, re-intervention, and heart failure were reported.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review and no device was received for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SJM® MECHANICAL HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL PUERTO RICO, INC.
p.o. box 998
lot 20 b st.
caguas, puerto rico 00725
*  00725
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL PUERTO RICO, INC.
p.o. box 998
lot 20 b st.
caguas, puerto rico 00725
*   00725
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key13252213
MDR Text Key289014844
Report Number2648612-2022-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P810002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/13/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/28/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight74 KG
-
-