Batch review performed on 21 january 2022: lot 1923914: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 12-may-2020.Expiration date: 2025-04-26.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been already sold without any similar reported event.Visual inspection performed by spine r&d project manager: four mecta-c stand alone cages have been used to stabilize c3-c7 and after one year fixation is deemed not sufficient, so the cages are removed.After the visual inspection no critical issues are noted: the implants are not broken and did not fail mechanically.There are scratches visible on the implants but they could be related to the removal surgery.Clinical evaluation performed by medacta medical affairs director: 4 standalone cervical cages have been used to stabilize c3-c7 and after one year fixation is deemed not sufficient, so the cages are removed.They are not broken and did not fail mechanically, but the patient did not achieve fusion.According to report, it's probable that patient cooperation hasn't been optimal.In such a long construct, often posterior fixation is also sought to supplement the cages, but the primary surgeon decided otherwise.The long construct is naturally challenging, although it is not outside of the product indications.A very cooperative patient is certainly helpful to get a good result in a challenging case.
|
The patient was revised about 1 year after the primary surgery (primary surgery date is unknown, probably in (b)(6) 2020).Explantation of 4 mecta-c sa implants on c3-c7 and replaced with competitor component.An additional posterior tension band was performed.The surgeon does not think that there is any implant failure of medacta, but a suboptimal strategy to perform the initial surgery (using 4 mecta-c sa is not the right way in the surgeon's opinion, but cage and plate would be the best way, combined with posterior tension band as described above, if necessary).
|