Model Number 242437 |
Device Problems
Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/13/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the sales rep that during a shoulder repair surgery on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the coupler ac ffl 19 device had trouble closing and focusing.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h10: investigation summary: the complaint device was received at the manufacturing site and evaluated.Per service reports, this complaint cannot be confirmed.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: minor scratches on the unit.Traces of use on the grasping mechanism.The endoscope grasping mechanism (gm) , were replaced to resolve the issues.After repair, the device was found to be working according to the specifications.The user error was identified as the root cause for the device failure during the service evaluation.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : in addition to the complaint sample, the customer provided a photo which shows both couplers and their corresponding serial number, few scratches can be observed.The endoscope grasping mechanism (gm) , were replaced to resolve the issues.After repair, the device was found to be working according to the specifications.The user error was identified as the root cause for the device failure during the service evaluation.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: h10: the type of investigation has been updated to reflect the additional information of the photo provided by the customer.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received at the manufacturing site and evaluated.It was reported that trouble closing in addition to focusing issues.Per service reports, this complaint cannot be confirmed.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: minor scratches on the unit.Traces of use on the grasping mechanism.The customer provided a photo which shows the device's lens and the serial number.The endoscope grasping mechanism (gm) , were replaced to resolve the issues.After repair, the device was found to be working according to the specifications.The user error was identified as the root cause for the device failure during the service evaluation.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|