This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received and photo provided by the customer.Visual inspection revealed that the package of the device was unopened, and the tray was not damage.It was observed a foreign matter inside the package, and it is unknown what it is; therefore, the device was sent to manufacturer.The photo showed the same condition found during the physical analysis.The certificate of analysis and certificate of compliance for this manufactured lot was reviewed and there were no non-conformances or deviations for this lot on the coc.Based on the visual inspection; this complaint can be confirmed.A ft-ir (fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) test was performed by the manufacturer, the purpose of this analysis is to identify chemical composition.The results of the ftir showed that the spectrum of the foreign matter and some part material are the same; see attachment "(b)(4) analysis¿.As agreed, a nonconformance record was created to document the root cause and identify a corrective and/or preventive action plan.A manufacturing investigation was performed; as a result, the operator will put the product in the anti-static device to eliminate the foreign matter and put it into the auto-packing machine.There are 100% visual inspection the product after the packaging is completed.The inspection for the above criteria shall be performed without magnification under normal room lighting.The product is to be viewed at a distance of 12 to 15 inches for approximately 3 seconds.Qc sampling based on qc plan definition and recording the sampling result, please refer to the attached.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthese mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|