• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET UK LTD. UNKNOWN OXFORD BEARING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET UK LTD. UNKNOWN OXFORD BEARING Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Joint Dislocation (2374)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Initial report.Report source, foreign - event occurred in (b)(6).The client has indicated that the product will not be returned to zimmer biomet for an investigation.The investigation is currently underway.Once the investigation has concluded, a follow-up mdr will be tendered.
 
Event Description
Title: bearing separation from the lateral wall of the tibial component is a risk of anterior dislocation of the mobile-bearing in oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Authors: takafumi hiranaka, yoshihito suda, tomoyuki kamenaga, takaaki fujishiro, motoki koide, akira saitoh, atsuki tanaka, akihiko arimoto, koji okamoto.On 24-jan-2022, a journal article was retrieved from the journal of arthroplasty (2022) that reported a study from (b)(6) that looked at whether bearing separation from the lateral wall of the tibial component is a risk of anterior dislocation of the mobile-bearing in oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.The study retrospectively analysed twelve-one dislocations in twelve patients which included the incidence of separation, the direction and the recurrence of the dislocations, and their causes.The study reported that five of the twelve patients had separation.Of the total of 21 dislocations, 11 occurred in cases of separation (52%).Seven out of 11 anterior dislocations were found to have separation, whereas nine out of 13 posterior dislocations occurred without separation (p = 0.0237).Three out of five patients with separation had a recurrence of dislocation, and eventually, two underwent revision to fixed-bearing uka.Case three: it was reported that a (b)(6) female patient underwent a revised bearing to +1 thickness due to dislocation which occurred while she was sleeping.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2022.Title: bearing separation from the lateral wall of the tibial component is a risk of anterior dislocation of the mobile-bearing in oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Authors: takafumi hiranaka, yoshihito suda, tomoyuki kamenaga, takaaki fujishiro, motoki koide, akira saitoh, atsuki tanaka, akihiko arimoto, koji okamoto.On 24-jan-2022, a journal article was retrieved from the journal of arthroplasty (2022) that reported a study from japan that looked at whether bearing separation from the lateral wall of the tibial component is a risk of anterior dislocation of the mobile-bearing in oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.The study retrospectively analysed twelve-one dislocations in twelve patients which included the incidence of separation, the direction and the recurrence of the dislocations, and their causes.The study reported that five of the twelve patients had separation.Of the total of 21 dislocations, 11 occurred in cases of separation (52%).Seven out of 11 anterior dislocations were found to have separation, whereas nine out of 13 posterior dislocations occurred without separation (p = 0.0237).Three out of five patients with separation had a recurrence of dislocation, and eventually, two underwent revision to fixed-bearing uka.Case six: it was reported that a 76-year-old female patient underwent two bearing revisions revised to +1 thickness due to dislocations that occurred while she was sleeping.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Complaint summary: the product has not been returned for evaluation.The item and lot number have not been provided.X-rays or medical notes have not been provided.The investigation has been limited to the information provided.A historical search could not be performed as the item and lot number have not been provided.This device is used for treatment.Not enough information has been provided to determine if all implants are compatible.A dhr review or a review of recalls could not be performed as the item and lot number have not been provided.The likely condition of the device when it left zimmer biomet could not be determined as the item and lot number has not been provided.The root cause of the reported event can not be determined with the information provided.No corrective action is required at this time as the root cause of the reported event has not been determined.If any additional information is discovered or received that may adjust any conclusions or data, a supplemental report will be rendered accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Follow-up report that contains corrections.Fields corrected b5 and h10.G2: report source, foreign - event occurred in japan.D10: the client has indicated that the product will not be returned to zimmer biomet for an investigation.The investigation is currently underway.Once the investigation has concluded, a follow-up mdr will be tendered.
 
Event Description
(b)(6) 2022.Title: bearing separation from the lateral wall of the tibial component is a risk of anterior dislocation of the mobile-bearing in oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Authors: takafumi hiranaka, yoshihito suda, tomoyuki kamenaga, takaaki fujishiro, motoki koide, akira saitoh, atsuki tanaka, akihiko arimoto, koji okamoto.On (b)(6) 2022, a journal article was retrieved from the journal of arthroplasty (2022) that reported a study from japan that looked at whether bearing separation from the lateral wall of the tibial component is a risk of anterior dislocation of the mobile-bearing in oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.The study retrospectively analysed twelve-one dislocations in twelve patients which included the incidence of separation, the direction and the recurrence of the dislocations, and their causes.The study reported that five of the twelve patients had separation.Of the total of (b)(4) dislocations, (b)(4) occurred in cases of separation (b)(4).(b)(4) anterior dislocations were found to have separation, whereas (b)(4) posterior dislocations occurred without separation (p = (b)(4)).Three out of five patients with separation had a recurrence of dislocation, and eventually, two underwent revision to fixed-bearing uka.Case six: it was reported that a 76-year-old female patient underwent two bearing revisions revised to +1 thickness due to dislocations that occurred while she was sleeping.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN OXFORD BEARING
Type of Device
UNKNOWN OXFORD BEARING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET UK LTD.
waterton industrial estates
bridgend CF31 3XA
UK  CF31 3XA
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET UK LTD.
waterton industrial estates
bridgend CF31 3XA
UK   CF31 3XA
Manufacturer Contact
christina arnt
56 e. bell dr.
warsaw, IN 46582
5745273773
MDR Report Key13440262
MDR Text Key289269275
Report Number3002806535-2022-00043
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
N/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/03/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN OXFORD BEARING
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexPrefer Not To Disclose
-
-