On (b)(6)2021, a procedure was being performed and the patient was pinned on the stretcher.When the patient was flipped on the or table into position, the hfd100 skull clamp slipped off.As a result, the pins scratched the patients head causing a minor laceration.The skull clamp was adjusted however, it slipped a second time.The skull clamp was exchanged but it failed to properly clamp on the first time.A second attempt was performed and the clamp worked as normal.The surgeon concluded that the first skull clamp malfunction and the second skull clamp first attempt failure were caused by operator error.The skull clamps and associated torque screws were replaced and returned for further evaluation.
|
The two skull clamps and associated torque screws were inspected and evaluated and both skull clamps functioned as intended.The bottom lock mechanisms appeared to work normally on both clamps and the failure modes were unable to be reproduced.The torque screw associated with the first skull clamp (slip/laceration) was found to be functioning within specification at 40, 60, and 80 lb.However, the settings were found to be out of calibration at the lowest setting of 20 lbs.The underlying cause appeared to be a weakened spring although it did not appear to be related to the slippage.The second torque screw was found to be within calibration and functioned as intended.Based on the investigation, it is difficult to determine the root cause of the slippage but there is a possibility that user error caused or contributed to the event.Data is not available from the hospital to assess the specific application of the skull clamp to this patient.This mdr is being submitted outside of the required timeframe as part of remedial action initiated by the manufacturer, in response to internally identified issues regarding failed electronic submissions through webtrader.
|