Model Number 26605 |
Device Problems
Material Deformation (2976); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/03/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was stent damage.A carotid wallstent monorail 8.0-21 was selected for a carotid stenting procedure.When the stent was removed from the sterile package, a deformation in the mesh structure was noticed.A 0.014 inch guidewire lumen was advanced to about 15-20 centimeters and would not advance further due to the deformation.The stent was removed and replaced with another stent to complete the procedure.There were no patient complications reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was stent damage.A carotid wallstent monorail 8.0-21 was selected for a carotid stenting procedure.When the stent was removed from the sterile package, a deformation in the mesh structure was noticed.A 0.014 inch guidewire lumen was advanced to about 15-20 centimeters and would not advance further due to the deformation.The stent was removed and replaced with another stent to complete the procedure.There were no patient complications reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1: initial reporter facility name: (b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr.: carotid wallstent monorail 8.0-21 was returned for analysis.This carotid device is recommended for use with a 0.014 inch (0.36mm) guidewire as per carotid wallstent instructions for use (ifu).During product analysis the investigator was unable to load the device on to a boston scientific 0.014 inch filterwire due to an obstruction inside the guidewire lumen.The guidewire used by the customer was not returned for analysis.A visual and tactile examination found no kinks to the shaft of the device.A guidewire insertion test identified an obstruction inside the guidewire lumen located at the monorail port.This type of damage is consistent with using excessive force when removing the product stylus and handling of the device during preparation which can compromise the patency of the of the inner guidewire lumen and contribute to an obstruction.The device was returned with the stent fully mounted in the correct location on the device.No issues or damage was noted to the wires of the stent.This concludes the product analysis.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|