First investigation: production process analysis: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to specification.User (surgeon and patient) information analysis: the patient is a (b)(6) year old male, risser 0 with a pre-op primary curve cobb of 49° and flexible.Immediate post-op x-rays, demonstrate that the implant was well positioned and that the curve was reduced to 35°.Later x-ray demonstrates that the extender-rod angle on lateral view demonstrates that the polyaxial joint is locked or almost locked.Five months post-surgery the main curve progressed to 52°, the system lower screw pulled out and the spine was imbalanced.Based on the available data, a possible reason for the screw pullout (failure) is the rapid progression of the patient's scoliosis from 35° to 52° in parallel to the polyaxial joint of the extender-rod leading to improper alignment of the extender with the mid-c rod, inducing high pullout forces on the distal pedicle screw.The company chief medical officer advised the surgeon to remove the system and fuse the spine, however the patient's family requested to have a new mid-c system implanted.Revision surgery is planned to (b)(6) 2022.
|