• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 01/01/2011
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of pelvic pain ('pain') in a (b)(6) female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient experienced pelvic pain (seriousness criteria disability and intervention required), palpitations ("palpitations"), genital haemorrhage ("haemorrhage"), fatigue ("chronic fatigue") and abdominal distension ("swollen belly / swelling of the stomach").The patient was treated with surgery (removal of tubes and uterus).Essure was removed.At the time of the report, the pelvic pain, palpitations, genital haemorrhage, fatigue and abdominal distension outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for abdominal distension, fatigue, genital haemorrhage, palpitations and pelvic pain with essure.The reporter commented: that she has invisible handicap.The reporter informed that these case is a testimony from the patient on her ordeal which continues to this day, despite the removal of the essure implants.Based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data will be conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of pelvic pain ('pain') in a 55-year-old female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.In 2011, the patient experienced pelvic pain (seriousness criteria disability and intervention required), palpitations ("palpitations") and genital haemorrhage ("haemorrhage").On an unknown date, the patient experienced fatigue ("chronic fatigue"), abdominal distension ("swollen belly / swelling of the stomach"), complication of device removal ("first surgery to remove the implant did not follow the health process and failed"), gait disturbance ("difficulty walking and sitting") and mobility decreased ("difficulty walking and sitting").The patient was treated with surgery (removal of tubes and uterus).Essure was removed.At the time of the report, the pelvic pain, palpitations, genital haemorrhage, fatigue, abdominal distension and complication of device removal outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for abdominal distension, complication of device removal, fatigue, genital haemorrhage, palpitations and pelvic pain with essure.No further causality assessment were provided for the product.The reporter commented: that she has invisible handicap.The reporter informed that these case is a testimony from the patient on her ordeal which continues to this day, despite the removal of the essure implants."the article shares the testimony of a patient who used a bayer implant for several years (2011-2018).She says she suffered from various pains from the time the device was implanted in her body until it was removed.Today she says she suffers from a visible disability with difficulty walking and sitting, with a regularly swollen belly.A first surgery to remove the implant did not follow the health process and failed, having bad consequences for her body.Eventually, a second surgery was ordered to removed the implant completely, but had to remove her tubes and uterus to save her." most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 9-feb-2022: adverse event "difficulty walking and sitting" added, reporter causality comment added; adverse events "pain", "palpitations", "genital haemorrhage" had the onset date updated; based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data will be conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of pelvic pain ('pain') in a 55-year-old female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.In 2011, the patient experienced pelvic pain (seriousness criteria disability and intervention required), palpitations ("palpitations") and genital haemorrhage ("haemorrhage").On an unknown date, the patient experienced fatigue ("chronic fatigue"), abdominal distension ("swollen belly / swelling of the stomach"), complication of device removal ("first surgery to remove the implant did not follow the health process and failed"), gait disturbance ("difficulty walking and sitting") and mobility decreased ("difficulty walking and sitting").The patient was treated with surgery (removal of tubes and uterus).Essure was removed.At the time of the report, the pelvic pain, palpitations, genital haemorrhage, fatigue, abdominal distension and complication of device removal outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for abdominal distension, complication of device removal, fatigue, gait disturbance, genital haemorrhage, mobility decreased, palpitations and pelvic pain with essure.The reporter commented: that she has invisible handicap.The reporter informed that these case is a testimony from the patient on her ordeal which continues to this day, despite the removal of the essure implants."the article shares the testimony of a patient who used a bayer implant for several years (2011-2018).She says she suffered from various pains from the time the device was implanted in her body until it was removed.Today she says she suffers from a visible disability with difficulty walking and sitting, with a regularly swollen belly.A first surgery to remove the implant did not follow the health process and failed, having bad consequences for her body.Eventually, a second surgery was ordered to removed the implant completely, but had to remove her tubes and uterus to save her." amendment: the report was amended for the following reason: upon review this report was detected to be a duplicate to record #(b)(4) to which all information will be transferred, then this duplicate #(b)(4) will be deleted in bayer safety database.No new follow-up information was received from the reporter.Based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data will be conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM  13353
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM   13353
Manufacturer Contact
k shaw lamberson
100 bayer blvd, p.o. box 915
whippany, nj 
MDR Report Key13480293
MDR Text Key288818178
Report Number2951250-2022-00103
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
UDI-Device Identifier10888853003051
UDI-Public(01)10888853003051
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/09/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Disability;
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-