• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALYDIA HEALTH JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALYDIA HEALTH JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number JADA - 1001
Device Problem Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure (3023)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number is not currently available for this event.We have attempted to request this information from the health care provider, no response to follow up attempts to date.A good faith effort to obtain lot number has been attempted.The device labeling states the indication for use of jada is "to provide control and treatment of abnormal postpartum uterine bleeding or hemorrhage when conservative management is warranted." precautions state, "the safety and effectiveness of the use of jada in patients with placenta accreta have not been evaluated." the instructions for use state, "jada placement: post vaginal delivery or post cesarean section after closure of hysterotomy.Secure visualization of the cervix to confirm it is dilated greater than 3 cm to allow for placement of jada." based on the overall information currently available for this case, a possible contributing or causal role of the jada system to the occurrence of the event (reported as "jada was not successful") cannot be excluded.However, the limited information provided with respect to the clinical details of the event precludes a complete and meaningful assessment.This report may be amended as appropriate if additional information is received regarding the event.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2022, an alydia health employee had a conversation with a friend who is an obstetrician, who reported that she had an opportunity to use a jada device for the first time and "jada was not successful." she went on to say that the patient in this case had undiagnosed placenta accreta and was only 8 cm dilated.The patient had a medical history of a previous cesarean section.She indicated that she had not been trained on jada use and was "unaware of the need to be 10 cm dilated but was now aware of this." it was not reported where she received this information from.There was no other information that was provided for this case.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number is not currently available for this event.We have attempted to request this information from the health care provider, no response to follow up attempts to date.A good faith effort to obtain lot number has been attempted.The device labeling states the indication for use of jada is "to provide control and treatment of abnormal postpartum uterine bleeding or hemorrhage when conservative management is warranted." precautions state, "the safety and effectiveness of the use of jada in patients with placenta accreta have not been evaluated." the instructions for use state, "jada placement: post vaginal delivery or post cesarean section after closure of hysterotomy.Secure visualization of the cervix to confirm it is dilated greater than 3 cm to allow for placement of jada." based on the overall information currently available for this case, a possible contributing or causal role of the jada system to the occurrence of the event (reported as "jada was not successful") cannot be excluded.However, the limited information provided with respect to the clinical details of the event precludes a complete and meaningful assessment.This report may be amended as appropriate if additional information is received regarding the event.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2022, an alydia health employee had a conversation with a friend who is an obstetrician, who reported that she had an opportunity to use a jada device for the first time and "jada was not successful." she went on to say that the patient in this case had undiagnosed placenta accreta and was only 8 cm dilated.The patient had a medical history of a previous cesarean section.She indicated that she had not been trained on jada use and was "unaware of the need to be 10 cm dilated but was now aware of this." it was not reported where she received this information from.There was no other information that was provided for this case.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JADA SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALYDIA HEALTH
3495 edison way
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALYDIA HEALTH
3495 edison way
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer Contact
heather wisler
3495 edison way
menlo park, CA 94025
8445232666
MDR Report Key13506615
MDR Text Key286085025
Report Number3017425145-2022-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OQY
UDI-Device Identifier00850017882003
UDI-Public(01)00850017882003
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K201199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/10/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberJADA - 1001
Device Catalogue NumberJADA-1001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age30 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-