|
Model Number 72290129 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Mechanical Problem (1384)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/28/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference case- (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a meniscal root repair, with a firstpass mini suture passer, the surgeon was using the device as per technique, there was sufficient room in the knee for the needle to pass.It was noticed that the upper jaw was not holding onto the tape and kept dropping it, after 5 passes the top jaw would not grasp the tape and the top retrieval jaw snapped off, it was located it and removed from the patient's knee using an ii machine and an arthroscopic grasper.The procedure was successfully completed with no delay using a back-up device.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10 h6 the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states smith and nephew has not received the device/relevant clinical documentation to perform a thorough medical investigation nor to determine the clinical root cause of the reported failure.Based on the information provided, the top retrieval jaw snapped off, it was located it and removed from the patient's knee using an ii machine and an arthroscopic grasper.According the report, the surgery completed without delay using a back-up device.Since no other patient complications were reported, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.There was no way to determine if the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: (1) excessive force (2) tissue thickness.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|