• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALYDIA HEALTH JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALYDIA HEALTH JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number JADA - 1001
Device Problem Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/19/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
An alydia health employee, executive director, engineering visited the reporting site on february 15, 2022, to examine the jada device in this case.He provided the following investigation.The device was in a biohazard bag and examination of the device was completed without removing the device from the bag, this was done to minimize potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens to both the personnel and office space.Vacuum connection (dr-030, stepped hand pump nozzle) was not present in the bag.The distal end of the device was straightened and examined for any anomalies, none found,.The area around the y-connector was examined and no anomalies were found.A close examination of the connection point for the connector showed the rough appearance of adhesive remnants suggesting that adhesive was used on this joint.There was no sign of damage or trauma to the connection point on the device.The only conclusion that can be drawn is the adhesive attaching the vacuum connector to the device failed.The seal inflation valve was present on the device and no anomalies were noted.The seal of the device was inflated indicating there is not an issue with the seal (balloon) performance.There was no damage to the device other than the missing vacuum connector.There was no sign of tearing or ripping of the silicone around the area where the vacuum connector attaches to the device.Remnants of adhesive at the vacuum connector joint location suggests proper assembly.It appears the adhesive joint failed.Based on the overall information currently provided in this report, there is a reasonable possibility that a potential malfunction (reported as "vacuum connection that is glued to the rubberized arm came apart") has occurred with the jada system.However, it is unlikely that if the suspected malfunction were to recur, would cause or contribute to a death or serious injury given that the hcp would recognize this issue while initiating use of the jada system and would be able to take timely appropriate actions as further supported by the clinical course presented in this case wherein the hcp reportedly replaced the device immediately with another jada system in approximately "10-15 seconds" and the patient's bleeding was reportedly controlled successfully with the second jada system device.However, out of an abundance of caution, this case will be reported as a malfunction mdr.
 
Event Description
The health care provider (hcp) emailed an alydia health employee stating, "had a problem with a device yesterday.We will be reporting it out.The vacuum connection that is glued to the rubberized arm came apart didn't know if you had any other issues.This seems like a manufacturing issue." in a follow up phone call with the hcp, he confirmed that the date of this event was (b)(6) 2022.He was present for the case and explained that the "vacuum connection that is glued to the rubberized arm came apart." he said that when they attempted to hook the jada device up to suction it "came undone from the rubber tubing" and they were unable to attach the device to the wall suction.He described that they tried to connect the tubing to wall suction and that "torque on connector pulled the glue off." he confirmed the jada device was indwelling for a patient experiencing abnormal postpartum bleeding when this occurred and that they immediately replaced the device with another jada in approximately "10-15 seconds." the patients bleeding was successfully controlled with this second device.The hcp declined to provide patient information for this case.The jada device for this case has been retained and he requested replacement for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JADA SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALYDIA HEALTH
3495 edison way
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALYDIA HEALTH
3495 edison way
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer Contact
heather wisler
3495 edison way
menlo park, CA 94025
8445232666
MDR Report Key13560699
MDR Text Key296388789
Report Number3017425145-2022-00011
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OQY
UDI-Device Identifier00850017882003
UDI-Public(01)00850017882003
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K201199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/18/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberJADA - 1001
Device Catalogue NumberJADA-1001
Device Lot Number1070801
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-