• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL SHE_2RSTCK_5.9,30,167CW_ MITEK; RIGID ENDOSCOPE SHEATH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL SHE_2RSTCK_5.9,30,167CW_ MITEK; RIGID ENDOSCOPE SHEATH Back to Search Results
Model Number 242025
Device Problems Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Difficult to Advance (2920); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/10/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported by the customer that during an unknown arthroscopy procedure on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the o-ring on the she_2rstck_5.9,30,167cw_ mitek device was loose.According to the report, the surgeon tried to tighten the o-ring but the entire sheath fell apart.It was further reported that the surgeon stated that the sheath or the trochanter ¿felt bent¿ as it did not slide smoothly.The procedure was completed successfully.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Visual observations revealed the device had wear marks indicating it was heavily used in the field.The device was found with a lot of scratches in the entire tubing.The distal part of the shaft appeared to be deformed.Finally, the mitek lock is not attached in the device and wear marks were identified near the connection points.The bent shaft might have contributed to the reported unable to disassemble condition.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.Based on the visual inspection of the device, this complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure can be related when the device might have been dropped or device was tapped against a hard surface accidentally, as well as rough use by the user.As per ifu, do not use a damaged or defective endoscope.Inspect the endoscope prior to each examination or procedure and before sterilization based on the instructions in this document; it is important to check the shaft for bending, scratches, dents, corrosion, pitting, or other surface irregularities.Do not hold the endoscope by its shaft; this may cause damage and do not bend the endoscope or subject the endoscope to impact.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SHE_2RSTCK_5.9,30,167CW_ MITEK
Type of Device
RIGID ENDOSCOPE SHEATH
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin blanc 38
le locle CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
chemin-blanc 38
le locle CH-24-00
SZ   CH-2400
6013142063
MDR Report Key13637481
MDR Text Key288199386
Report Number1221934-2022-00668
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NBH
UDI-Device Identifier10886705029013
UDI-Public10886705029013
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/01/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number242025
Device Catalogue Number242025
Device Lot Number1525883
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/27/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-