• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER; INTERVERTEBAL FUSION DEVICE W/BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER; INTERVERTEBAL FUSION DEVICE W/BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Nerve Damage (1979); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Vertebral Fracture (4520); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown cage/spacer/unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the udi number and 510-k number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Reporter is a j&j employee.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of a clinical evaluation report (cer) from a database related research activity (drra) for a total of 755 patients (772 procedures) who were operated with depuy synthes anterior cervical plates from july 26, 2005, to september 18, 2021.There were 364 females and 408 males with a mean age of 54.8 years.It was not specified in the (b)(6) registry report which of the devices mentioned have caused the adverse events.It was also not specified in which country the adverse events have occurred.Thus, each country mentioned in the surgery activity will be captured conservatively and complications will be reported as follows: intraoperative surgical complications: 1 patient had nerve root damage.10 patients had dural lesion.4 patients had other complications.Postoperative complications as follows: general complications: 5 patients had cardiovascular complications.8 patients had pulmonary complications.3 patients had cerebral complications.1 patient had kidney/urinary complications.2 patients had liver/gastrointestinal complications.5 patients died.8 patients had other complications.Surgical complications: 2 patients had epidural hematoma.12 patients had other hematoma.3 patients had radiculopathy.23 patients had motor dysfunction.11 patients had sensory dysfunction.2 patients had bowel/bladder dysfunction.2 patients had wound infection superficial.1 patient had implant malposition.3 patients had implant failure.11 patients had other complications.Complications at follow-up: 16 patients had sensory dysfunction.21 patients had motory dysfunction.2 patients had bowel/bladder dysfunction.9 patients had nonunion.9 patients had implant failure.1 patient had cerebrospinal fluid leak/ pseudomeningocele.6 patients had superficial wound infection.1 patient had deep wound infection.6 patients had epidural hematoma.7 patients had extravertebral hematoma.8 patients had implant malposition.6 patients had recurrence of symptoms.2 patients had graft complication.1 patient had internal medical complication.9 patients had adjacent segment pathology.1 patient had decompensation of spine.2 patients had central nervous system complications.2 patients had fracture of vertebral structures.23 patients had other complications.Reoperations: 29 patients had reoperation at any level.5 patients had reoperation at the same level.4 patients had reoperation due to hardware removal.6 patients had reoperation due to non-union.3 patients had reoperation due to instability.1 patient had reoperation due to deep postoperative infection.4 patients had reoperation due to implant failure.2 patients had reoperation due to sagittal imbalance.4 patients had reoperation due to adjacent segment pathology.1 patient had reoperation due to other reasons.This is for unknown depuy spine cervical i/f cage, unknown depuy spine brantigan cage, unknown depuy spine bengal cage, unknown depuy spine harms cage, unknown depuy spine skyline, and unknown depuy spine mountaineer.This report is for unknown cage/spacer.This is report 6 of 6 for complaint (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBAL FUSION DEVICE W/BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INT SPINE
chemin blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ   02400
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6103142063
MDR Report Key13667207
MDR Text Key290951204
Report Number1526439-2022-00333
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/04/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/03/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-