As reported, when testing a bakri tamponade balloon catheter prior to use, the balloon broke.When the saline was injected into the balloon, it was discovered that there was a crack at the joint of the t-pipe.A new device was used to complete the procedure successfully.No adverse effects have been reported due to the occurrence.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary: as reported, when testing a bakri tamponade balloon catheter prior to use, the balloon broke.When the saline was injected into the balloon, it was discovered that there was a crack at the joint of the t-pipe.A new device was used to complete the procedure successfully.No adverse effects have been reported due to the occurrence.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.The device was returned for investigation without packaging or labeling.A cut/slice mark was observed in the material of the inflation arm toward the inflation valve.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.One potentially related non-conformance was recorded.Due to the individual nature of the manufacturing and inspection process it is unlikely that this nonconformance is an indication of a device issue within the entire lot.There have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is provided with instructions for use which state, "upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." based on the available information, cook has concluded that the most probable cause of the reported event could not be determined.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|