It was reported by (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the battery oscillator device failed visual inspection.It was further determined that the device had a worn bearing, sticky trigger, the battery casing device could not be engaged, component damage and contact damage.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for general condition, check the quick coupling for saw blades, check the battery casing coupling, check for sticky trigger.It was noted that not all pre-repair diagnostic assessments steps could be performed.It was noted in the service order that the device had a sawblade device still attached due to a pin fault within the attachment device while in use with another battery oscillator device.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a supplemental medwatch report will be filed as appropriate.Concomitant med products and therapy dates: battery oscillator device, (b)(6) 2021.Device history review: a review of the device history record was performed which indicated that there were no relevant issues identified during the manufacture of the device that may have contributed to the reported condition device evaluation: the actual device was returned for evaluation.Quality engineering evaluated the device and it was determined that the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause for the cracked saw head locking mechanism was determined to be traced to device design and further investigation and assessment is covered under a capa.The assignable root cause for the sticky trigger and the other found defects was determined to be due to component failure from wear.Udi: ((b)(4).
|