The initial reporter received a questionable elecsys anti-sars-cov-2 result for one external quality assessment (eqa) sample compared to other manufacturer assays.The roche analyzer used for testing and the date of the event were requested but not provided.The eqa sample was reportedly provided from a healthy single donor.The eqa sample had a positive result with the elecsys anti-sars-cov-2 assay.The eqa sample had a negative result with the abbott sars-cov-2 igg assay, euroimmun anti-sars-cov-2 ncp elisa igg assay, and shenzen yhlo biotech iflash-sars-cov-2 igg assay.The abbott sars-cov-2 igg assay was tested on both the architect and alinity analyzers.The expected result for the eqa sample was negative.
|
The investigation reproduced the customer's elecsys anti-sars-cov-2 result.The investigation tested the sample with the elecsys anti-sars-cov-2 s assay, 487 u/ml, and two different rapid tests, both reactive for igg but not igm antibodies.However, the rapid tests do not differentiate between antibodies directed against the nucleocapsid or spike protein.Consistent reactivity of the sample with elecsys anti-sars-cov-2 in all laboratories using this assay indicated a previous unnoticed asymptomatic infection with sars-cov-2.A discrepancy in igg assays may be due to different assay formats used in igg and total antibody assays.Decreasing antibody titers over time have been frequently reported for igg assays, whereas antibody levels remain stable in total antibody assays using the nucleocapsid antigen.Further clarification of the observed discrepancies is not possible with available methods and the current state of the art.
|