• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G49933
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/22/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
As reported, when advancing a universa soft ureteral stent over the pusher, the stent separated.The device did not make patient contact.A photo of the device shows the separation occurred at the proximal pigtail at the non-tether end.A new stent set was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Event summary: as reported, when advancing a universa soft ureteral stent over the pusher, the stent separated.The device did not make patient contact.A photo of the device shows the separation occurred at the proximal pigtail at the non-tether end.A new stent set was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), personnel interviews, the instructions for use, and quality control data.A device failure analysis was able to be conducted on the returned device.The device was returned in opened original packaging without the tether.In contrast to the customer supplied additional information, the coil on the stent¿s tethered end was observed to be separated.The length of the separated segment was measured to be 4.5cm.In addition, the separated end had a tear spanning between the first sideport from the end to the end.This tear in the separated coil was thought to likely be caused by the act of removing the tether.The wire guide was returned and inspected.No defects were found.The cause of the coil separation was unable to be determined with the available information.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: how supplied: upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ the cause of the coil separation was unable to be determined with the available information.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8128294891
MDR Report Key13713627
MDR Text Key295344244
Report Number1820334-2022-00370
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002499331
UDI-Public(01)00827002499331(17)220822(10)9966610
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K151051
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/09/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/22/2022
Device Model NumberG49933
Device Catalogue NumberUSH-524
Device Lot Number9966610
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/22/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight72 KG
-
-