Reported event: an event regarding wear involving a patient specific, distal humeral replacement was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by clinical consultant indicated: the implant in situ was for patient specific distal humeral replacement.The implant was inserted in (b)(6) 2006 and revised in (b)(6) 2015.Now the surgeon reported bushing failure.The ct image provided shows that the humeral component has been removed, together with all the bushing components and replaced by a humeral cement spacer.Only the ulnar component is in situ.Therefore, the radiographic review cannot confirm the clinical report.Device history review: review of the product history records indicate the device was manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been 2 other events for the lot referenced for the same patient.Conclusion: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, pathology reports, progress notes, additional x-rays relevant to the failure as noted in event description and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|