• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ALCUNK00059
Device Problem Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A physician reported following an glaucoma shunt implant procedure, the glaucoma filtration device has shifted outward in the eye.The patient has now been admitted to hospital as an inpatient.Additional information has been requested and received which states that the patient was already operated on earlier that day, so information is not needed urgently anymore.Patient is doing fine so far.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A sample device was not returned for analysis.Complaint history and product history record could not be reviewed because the reporting facility did not provide a valid lot number or any identification traceable to the manufacturing documentation.Root cause has not been identified.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information provided in h.3., h.6.And h.10.A sample was not received at the manufacturing site for evaluation; therefore, the condition of the product could not be evaluated.Due to insufficient data and no sample received, the customer reported event could not be confirmed.Based on the complaint reported event, the complaint review activities and sample evaluation that could not be conducted, - no evidence has been presented, obtained or identified concluding the device failed to meet specification, - the device was used for treatment according to the reported event.- relationship of the device to the reported incident: according to the event description hcp reported the device is related to the incident however this could not be determined at this time by the manufacturing site.Since the root cause cannot be determined, no additional action can be taken at this stage.Per most recent trending, no associated trend alert was observed.All complaints are reviewed on a monthly basis, and corrective actions will be defined if required.The company has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trends and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
Manufacturer (Section G)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS   90850
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key13735222
MDR Text Key287022157
Report Number3003701944-2022-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/11/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberALCUNK00059
Device Lot NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
-
-