• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TELEFLEX MEDICAL ARROW; WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TELEFLEX MEDICAL ARROW; WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number IPN037314
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Device Markings/Labelling Problem (2911); Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem (2975)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 02/15/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Patient found to be bleeding from right radial arterial line, saturating pillow hand was on.Dressing taken down to be changed when significant amount of blood squirting out from the area of the catheter closest to the line attached.Occluded with gauze and arterial line removed.This has happened on 6 occasions in the last 2 months.4 of the catheters were sent to teleflex arrow international for investigation.Manufacturer response for arrow arterial access kit ask-04001-bid2, arterial access kit ask-04001-bid2 (per site reporter): email from teleflex arrow international sales representative: i did complete the two additional complaints last week and expect that she will send out the acknowledgments and shipping labels shortly.I don¿t know if she is off this week, but i will check as i usually hear from her very quickly.With regard to the kit, our internal review has provided some interesting findings that were brought to my attention.First, the 20g catheter-over-needle in the kit is actually identified in the ifu as an introducer and not as an indwelling catheter.For this reason, the kit was labeled as an arterial access kit (rather than arterial catheter kit), meaning that the components are used to gain access for an additional catheter of the inserter¿s choosing that will stay with the patient.I don¿t think anyone (me included) realized this.The catheter in the kit is not the same design as the arterial catheter (as shown by the pictures you sent) and is not tested to the requirements of an arterial catheter.In the next few days i am expecting to receive a non-sterile kit prototype in which the original catheter-over-needle is replaced by one that is indicated for arterial use.I will bring it to dr.To review when i receive it.He is copied on the email so he can be aware of what is going on and what has been discussed thus far.Also copying, as she had reached out to me about this separately.We believe this change will address the issues with the kit.In the meantime, we should notify the inserters of the need to place an additional catheter when using this kit.
 
Event Description
Patient found to be bleeding from right radial arterial line, saturating pillow hand was on.Dressing taken down to be changed when significant amount of blood squirting out from the area of the catheter closest to the line attached.Occluded with gauze and arterial line removed.This has happened on 6 occasions in the last 2 months.4 of the catheters were sent to teleflex arrow international for investigation.Manufacturer response for arrow arterial access kit ask-04001-bid2, arterial access kit ask-04001-bid2 (per site reporter): email from teleflex arrow international sales representative: i did complete the two additional complaints last week and expect that she will send out the acknowledgments and shipping labels shortly.I don¿t know if she is off this week, but i will check as i usually hear from her very quickly.With regard to the kit, our internal review has provided some interesting findings that were brought to my attention.First, the 20g catheter-over-needle in the kit is actually identified in the ifu as an introducer and not as an indwelling catheter.For this reason, the kit was labeled as an arterial access kit (rather than arterial catheter kit), meaning that the components are used to gain access for an additional catheter of the inserter¿s choosing that will stay with the patient.I don¿t think anyone (me included) realized this.The catheter in the kit is not the same design as the arterial catheter (as shown by the pictures you sent) and is not tested to the requirements of an arterial catheter.In the next few days i am expecting to receive a non-sterile kit prototype in which the original catheter-over-needle is replaced by one that is indicated for arterial use.I will bring it to dr.To review when i receive it.He is copied on the email so he can be aware of what is going on and what has been discussed thus far.Also copying, as she had reached out to me about this separately.We believe this change will address the issues with the kit.In the meantime, we should notify the inserters of the need to place an additional catheter when using this kit.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARROW
Type of Device
WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
TELEFLEX MEDICAL
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville NC 27560
MDR Report Key13771764
MDR Text Key287209973
Report Number13771764
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/15/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberIPN037314
Device Catalogue NumberASK-04001-BID2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/22/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA03/02/2022
Device Age0 YR
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer03/15/2022
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-