• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: IMPERATIVE CARE. INC ZOOM REPERFUSION CATHETER; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

IMPERATIVE CARE. INC ZOOM REPERFUSION CATHETER; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER Back to Search Results
Model Number ICRC071137
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 02/12/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Zoom71 catheter was returned for investigation.Device investigation confirmed shaft separation at approximately 14 cm from the distal end of the catheter.The separated distal segment was observed to have a flattened marker band, exposed coil, extrusion and stretched liner.The separated proximal segment had multiple kinks and stretched extrusion on the distal end indicating retraction against resistance.Based on the location of the shaft separation (14cm) and the shape of the kink, it is possible that the separation occurred at the acute bend in the ica during retraction as it is suspected the catheter was pinned down at two locations (in the petrous and the acute bend in the proximal ica).Based on the information provided, the patient had tortuous anatomy with an acute bend in the proximal ica.Additionally, the physician indicated the zoom71 catheter got hung up in the "bad" stenosis present supraclinoid.The physician encountered resistance once zoom71 reached the supraclinoid and the catheter wouldn't advance further.Although access to the clot was obtained with a guidewire and zoom 71, the physician could not advance the tracstar ldp past the acute bend.Per zoom 71 instruction for use: "do not advance or withdraw the zoom catheter or accessory/adjunctive devices against resistance without careful assessment of cause under fluoroscopy.If the cause cannot be determined, withdraw all devices as a single unit.Excessive manipulation and torquing the device against resistance may result in damage to the vasculature or the device" and "do not use kinked devices." the manufacturing records of this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any issues pertaining to design, manufacturing, or quality.Appropriate testing and inspection were completed to ensure the device met minimum tensile specification and is kink resistant.The distal section undergoes 100% visual inspection and is free of visual defects.
 
Event Description
The patient was being treated for an occlusion at the right internal carotid artery (ica) mi terminus segment.The patient reportedly had a tortuous anatomy with an acute bend noted in the proximal ica.A quick access was obtained with the guidewire, tracstar ldp and zoom71.Tracstar was parked just before the proximal acute bend and did not go beyond this bend.The physician encountered resistance once zoom71 reached the supraclinoid and the catheter wouldn't advance further.There was a "bad" stenosis there and the physician felt the zoom71 catheter got hung up in the stenosis.Primary aspiration was made with the zoom71 with a result of tici 2b.During removal of the zoom71, the catheter separated 14mm from the distal end and remained in the right ica.Visual confirmation was made on fluoroscopy, and multiple attempts were made to remove the distal portion of the zoom71 but were unsuccessful.The patient was referred to vascular surgery and a cut down of the right ica was performed.The distal portion of the catheter was successfully removed.During post cut down, angiography showed a clot in the distal ica.Tracstar ldp 95cm, zoom55, competitor microcatheter, and stent retriever were used through the existing groin access to remove the clot successfully.Angiographic result showed tici 2c after second pass.Next day post procedure, patient's care was withdrawn, and the patient passed away three days later.Per the account, death was the result of age and having a "really bad stroke".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZOOM REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
IMPERATIVE CARE. INC
1359 dell avenue
campbell CA 95008 6609
Manufacturer (Section G)
IMPERATIVE CARE, INC
1359 dell avenue
campbell CA 95008 6609
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
1359 dell avenue
campbell, CA 95008-6609
MDR Report Key13779489
MDR Text Key288480012
Report Number3014590708-2022-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00812212030450
UDI-Public00812212030450
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K211476
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/16/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/11/2022
Device Model NumberICRC071137
Device Catalogue NumberICRC071137
Device Lot NumberF2131201
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/02/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/14/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/11/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
.014 GUIDEWIRE; 8F SHORT SHEATH; SOLITAIRE 4 X 20; SYNCHRO SUPPORT; TRACSTAR LDP 95CM; VELOCITY; ZOOM 55
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age91 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight78 KG
-
-