Title: management of aseptic failure of the mobile-bearing oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Authors: shiraz a.Sabah, chin tat lim, robert middleton, lennart von fritsch, nicholas bottomley, william f.M.Jackson, andrew j.Price, abtin alvand.Published 07 october 2020.On 15-sep-2021, a journal article was retrieved from the knee (2020) that reported a study from the united kingdom that looked at aseptic revisions in unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.The purpose of the study was to understand the revision strategies and clinical outcomes for aseptic, failed ukas.The study reviewed 48 patients (31 female, 17 male) / 52 knees revised from 2006 to 2018 at a single facility.All failed implants were mobile-bearing oxford ukas, comprising 47 medial ukas (bridgend) and five lateral ukas (warsaw).Fifty ukas (96.2%) were cemented and two (3.8%) were uncemented.Median time to revision was 67 (range 4¿180) months.Indications for revision were progression of osteoarthritis (n = 31 knees, 59.6%), unexplained pain (n = 10 knees, 19.2%), aseptic loosening (n = 6 knees, 11.5%).Medial collateral ligament incompetence (n = 3 knees, 5.8%) and recurrent bearing dislocation (n = 2 knees, 3.8%).Failed ukas were revised to primary tkas (n = 29 knees, 55.8%), revision tkas (n = 9 knees, 17.3%), bicompartmental kas (n = 11 knees, 21.2%), or unicompartmental-to-unicompartmental kas (n = 3 knees, 5.8%).Median follow up was 81 (range 24¿164) months.The study population had a mean age of 65 years at time of surgery (range 31.9-84.2 years).The study reports revision due to medial collateral ligament incompetence in three patients.
|
(b)(4).This is a combined initial/final report and is being submitted to relay information.Report source, foreign: event occurred in (b)(6).The product will not be returned to zimmer biomet for an investigation as the product location is unknown.Medical product: unknown oxford bearing, catalog #: unknown, lot #:unknown.Medical product: unknown oxford femoral component, catalog #: unknown, lot #: unknown.Multiple mdr reports were filed for this event, please see associated reports: 3002806535-2022-00135, 3002806535-2022-00136.Complaint summary: product has not been returned for evaluation.The item and lot number have not been provided.X-rays or medical notes have not been provided.The investigation has been limited to the information provided.A historical search could not be performed as the item and lot number have not been provided.These devices are used for treatment.Not enough information has been provided to determine if all implants are compatible.A dhr review or a review of recalls could not be performed as the item and lot number have not been provided.The likely condition of the devices when they left zimmer biomet could not be determined as the item and lot number has not been provided.The root cause of the reported event can not be determined with the information provided.No corrective action required at this time as the root cause of the reported event has not been determined.
|