• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKN REFLECTION LINER; PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKN REFLECTION LINER; PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Material Erosion (1214); Naturally Worn (2988); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Osteolysis (2377); Tissue Breakdown (2681); Fluid Discharge (2686)
Event Date 09/27/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that on literature review "(b)(6) infection of total hip arthroplasty after intravesicular bacillus calmette-guerin", after a left tha performed on 2005, the patient had a fluctuant subcutaneous collection over the anterior aspect of the left thigh.The radiography revealed eccentric wear of polythene liner and proximal femoral osteolysis.A magnetic resonance imaging scan showed a lesion overlying the quadriceps.The patient underwent revision surgery with exchange of the liner and the head on (b)(6) 2015.It is unknown if the devices implanted during revision were from smith and nephew.Patient is recovered.No further information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Williams, a., arnold, b., & gwynne-jones, d.P.(2019).Mycobacterium bovis infection of total hip arthroplasty after intravesicular bacillus calmette-guérin.Arthroplasty today, 5(4), 416-420.Doi: doi.Org/10.1016/j.Artd.2019.08.004.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.The images provided in the article have been interpreted within the text; therefore, no further analysis of the images are required.The root cause and/or patient outcome beyond that which was documented in the article could not be confirmed nor concluded; therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should clinical documentation become available in the future, a thorough medical assessment may be rendered at that time.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Some potential probable causes for this event could include but not limited to inflammation, surgical complication, traumatic injury, adverse reaction, patient condition, friction, joint tightness or lifetime of device.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.The images provided in the article have been interpreted within the text; therefore, no further analysis of the images are required.The root cause and/or patient outcome beyond that which was documented in the article could not be confirmed nor concluded; therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should clinical documentation become available in the future, a thorough medical assessment may be rendered at that time.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Some potential probable causes for this event could include but not limited to inflammation, surgical complication, traumatic injury, adverse reaction, patient condition, friction, joint tightness or lifetime of device.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: medical device problem code.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKN REFLECTION LINER
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13863987
MDR Text Key288808589
Report Number1020279-2022-01276
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNZ
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/15/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/23/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-